Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37548727›Full record

ReviewActa neurochirurgica. Supplement2023

Complications of Endovascular and Open Aneurysm Surgery in the Era of Flow Diversion.

Yair M Gozal, Hussam Abou-Al-Shaar, Gmaan Alzhrani, Philipp Taussky, William T Couldwell

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yair M GozalDepartment of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Hussam Abou-Al-ShaarDepartment of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Gmaan AlzhraniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Philipp TausskyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
William T CouldwellDepartment of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. neuropub@hsc.utah.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The techniques used for treatment of intracranial aneurysms have progressed dramatically over the decades. The introduction of modern endovascular techniques and the continued refinement of progressively less invasive neurosurgical approaches have contributed to steadily improving clinical outcomes. Moreover, innovations such as flow-diverting stents have achieved dramatic success and have gained rapid widespread adoption. Particularly in lesions for which the application of conventional treatment techniques is difficult, flow diversion technology has revolutionized aneurysm management. This review provides a discussion on the morbidity and mortality encountered in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in the modern era. Common adverse events faced in the management of these lesions with open surgery and various endovascular techniques are highlighted.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmHumansRetrospective StudiesStentsTreatment OutcomeClippingCoil embolizationComplicationFlow diverterIntracranial aneurysmMorbidityMortalityStent-assisted coiling

Identifiers

PMID37548727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.