Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37548718›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica. Supplement2023

Different Approaches in Skull Base Surgery Carry Risks for Different Types of Complications.

Joao Paulo Almeida, Miguel Marigil-Sanchez, Claire Karekezi, Ian Witterick, Fred Gentili

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joao Paulo AlmeidaDivision of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Miguel Marigil-SanchezDivision of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Claire KarekeziDivision of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ian WitterickDivision of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Fred GentiliDivision of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. fred.gentili@uhn.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complications are not uncommon in the complex field of skull base surgery. The intrinsic relationship of lesions in this region to important neurovascular structures, dura mater, and bone may lead to significant morbidity and mortality. The evolution of endoscopic endonasal surgery has had a significant impact on this field as a less invasive option for treatment of selected lesions, but major morbidity may still occur; moreover, endoscopic approaches have been associated with higher rates of some specific complications, such as cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Based on a presented case report, the authors discuss the management of various complications associated with different approaches for resection of skull base malignancies, including epidural and intradural pneumocephalus, subdural hematoma, and subdural empyema. Important lessons learned by the senior author throughout more than 30 years of his skull base surgery practice are highlighted. The inherent risk of complications in skull base surgery emphasizes the importance of their avoidance, prevention, and learning from one's unfavorable experience so as not to repeat them.

Indexed as

Neurosurgical ProceduresSkull BaseCerebrospinal Fluid LeakEndoscopyHumansNosePostoperative ComplicationsComplicationEndoscopic approachesNeurosurgeryPneumocephalusSkull base surgerySubdural empyemaSubdural hematoma

Identifiers

PMID37548718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.