Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37548702›Full record

Observational studyEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Long-term swallow outcomes and factors affecting swallowing dysfunction and quality of life among oral cancer patients: a prospective observational study.

Abhinav Thaduri, Sravani Reddy Kappari, Kinjal Shankar Majumdar, Achyuth Panuganti, Shahab Ali Usmani, Vikramjit Singh, Areej Moideen, Manu Malhotra, Pankaj Kumar Garg

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Phosphate level changes in oral cancer patients - recognizing the risk for refeeding syndrome.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Abhinav ThaduriDepartment of ENT, Prathima Relief Medical College, Warangal, India. abhinavthadurient@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3222-8125
Sravani Reddy KappariDepartment of ENT, Kamineni Academy of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Hyderabad, India.
Kinjal Shankar MajumdarDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, India.
Achyuth PanugantiDepartment of ENT, Mediciti Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India.
Shahab Ali UsmaniRemedy Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Lucknow, India.
Vikramjit SinghDepartment of ENT&Head and Neck Surgery, AIIMS, Rishikesh, India.
Areej MoideenDepartment of ENT&Head and Neck Surgery, AIIMS, Rishikesh, India.
Manu MalhotraDepartment of ENT&Head and Neck Surgery, AIIMS, Rishikesh, India.
Pankaj Kumar GargDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical and Health Science, Dehradun, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur · INKamineni Hospitals · INKasturba Medical College, Manipal · INMediciti Institute of Medical Sciences · INNational Institute of Technology Warangal · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral cancer is one of the most common cancers among the Indian population. India bears the most burden of oral cancer globally. Impairment of swallowing function is often seen after treatment for oral cancer. The oral phase of swallowing is disrupted in patients undergoing resection for oral cancer. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term swallowing outcomes of oral cancer patients using a patient-reported outcome questionnaire. METHODOLOGY: All consecutive oral cancer patients in the cT2-T4 category undergoing curative-intent surgery and reconstruction at our institute from March 2020 to March 2022 were included in the study. The Sydney Swallow questionnaire (SSQ) and functional oral intake scale (FOIS) assessed swallowing outcomes six months after definitive treatment. WHO BREF quality-of-life questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life.

resultsA total of seventy patients with oral cancer were included. The median age was 49 years. The majority of them were males (90%). Tumors with cT4 constituted 62%; the rest, 48%, were cT2 and cT3 categories. The bulk of them were buccoalveolar tumors (64.3%. Almost two-thirds of the patients received multimodal treatment. Trismus and xerostomia were at 46% and 88%, respectively. The mean SSQ score was 257.4 ± 99.1. Swallowing outcomes are affected by T stage (p = 0.01), extent of resection (p = 0.01), multimodality treatment (p < 0.01), trismus (p = 0.05), and xerostomia (p = 0.01). Almost 69% of them required special food preparation for swallowing (FOIS 4&5). Patients with buccoalveolar disease (p = 0.05) had significantly poor quality of life.

conclusionAn advanced stage with extensive resection and receiving multimodal treatment has adverse swallowing outcomes. Post-treatment trismus and xerostomia also significantly affected swallowing results.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersMouth NeoplasmsXerostomiaDeglutitionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeTrismusOral cancerPatient-reported outcomesQuality of lifeSwallowing dysfunctionSydney Swallow questionnaireTrismusXerostomia

Identifiers

PMID37548702
OpenAlexW4385619848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.