Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37548677›Full record

ArticleDie Anaesthesiologie2023

[Transition from intensive care to palliative care : A retrospective analysis of 102 consultation requests].

Kathrin Lustig, Frank Elsner, Norbert Krumm, Martin Klasen, Roman Rolke, Vera Peuckmann-Post

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kathrin LustigKlinik für Palliativmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Deutschland.
Frank ElsnerKlinik für Palliativmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Deutschland.
Norbert KrummKlinik für Palliativmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Deutschland.
Martin KlasenAIXTRA, Kompetenzzentrum für Training und Patientensicherheit, Medizinische Fakultät, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Deutschland.
Roman RolkeKlinik für Palliativmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Deutschland.
Vera Peuckmann-PostKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Medizinische Fakultät, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Deutschland. vpeuckmann@ukaachen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe transition of patients from the intensive care unit (ICU) to the palliative care (PC) ward often implies changes including establishing a palliative concept. Adaptation of therapeutic goals can be challenging for medical staff, patients and relatives; however, descriptions of these transition trajectories are rare.

objectiveThe aim of this retrospective study was to characterize the consultation requests of the ICU to the PC consultation team as well as the patients by a description of trajectories and interventions.

methodsRetrospective analysis of all patients receiving intensive care at RWTH Aachen University Hospital in 2019 for whom a PC consultation was requested. The patient population transferred from the ICU to the PC ward was compared with the non-transferred population. In each case, the primary consultation was evaluated regarding the following factors: question, vigilance, length of time from consultation request to its performance, and primary focus of the question. The question focus was categorized into "symptom control", "counselling" and "transfer" (tick options). In addition, a free text field was available for further notes. Exploration of diagnoses was complemented by accessing the electronic health records.

resultsA total of 102 consultation requests from the ICU to the PC ward were evaluated. The morbidity of patients was high, and most patients had at least one of the following diagnoses: pulmonary (62%), cardiovascular (61%), and/or neurological disease (55%). Of the patients 32 (31%) were transferred to the PC ward, among whom weakness (94%), fatigue (77%), anxiety (55%), pain (53%), and dyspnea (48%) were the most frequently noted symptoms. Of the transferred patients 5 (16%) could be discharged to home, nursing home, hospice or other. In total, 35 (34%) of all patients who were seen by palliative care specialists on ICUs in 2019 could be discharged alive. The most frequent reasons for nonadmission were lack of capacity of the PC ward (33%), dying while being on the waiting list (20%), and refusal by the patient (20%). Of the patients, 7 (26%) died within 48 h after they had been transferred to the PC ward. Performed consultation services "symptom control" (χ

conclusionThe need for palliative care support in the ICUs exceeded the admission capacity of the PC ward. Future studies should further examine palliative care models in intensive care medicine.

Indexed as

Hospice and Palliative Care NursingPalliative CareCritical CareHumansReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesConsultation teamIntensive carePalliative careSymptom managementTransition

Identifiers

PMID37548677
PMCPMC10457234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.