Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37548379›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2023

ChatGPT Chemistry Assistant for Text Mining and the Prediction of MOF Synthesis.

Zhiling Zheng, Oufan Zhang, Christian Borgs, Jennifer T Chayes, Omar M Yaghi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Advanced Porous Materials in Mixed Matrix Membranes for COSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sustainable Materials Design With Multi-Modal Artificial Intelligence.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  16. Reconstruction of human metabolic models with large language models.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhiling ZhengDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6090-2258
Oufan Zhang
Christian BorgsBakar Institute of Digital Materials for the Planet, College of Computing, Data Science, and Society, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.
Jennifer T ChayesBakar Institute of Digital Materials for the Planet, College of Computing, Data Science, and Society, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.
Omar M YaghiDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5611-3325

Funding

Calculating Ensembles of Discrete Dynamic Complexes and Condensed States of Intrinsically Disordered ProteinsR01GM127627 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Teresa L. Head-Gordon · 2018 to 2026
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM127627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We use prompt engineering to guide ChatGPT in the automation of text mining of metal-organic framework (MOF) synthesis conditions from diverse formats and styles of the scientific literature. This effectively mitigates ChatGPT's tendency to hallucinate information, an issue that previously made the use of large language models (LLMs) in scientific fields challenging. Our approach involves the development of a workflow implementing three different processes for text mining, programmed by ChatGPT itself. All of them enable parsing, searching, filtering, classification, summarization, and data unification with different trade-offs among labor, speed, and accuracy. We deploy this system to extract 26 257 distinct synthesis parameters pertaining to approximately 800 MOFs sourced from peer-reviewed research articles. This process incorporates our ChemPrompt Engineering strategy to instruct ChatGPT in text mining, resulting in impressive precision, recall, and F1 scores of 90-99%. Furthermore, with the data set built by text mining, we constructed a machine-learning model with over 87% accuracy in predicting MOF experimental crystallization outcomes and preliminarily identifying important factors in MOF crystallization. We also developed a reliable data-grounded MOF chatbot to answer questions about chemical reactions and synthesis procedures. Given that the process of using ChatGPT reliably mines and tabulates diverse MOF synthesis information in a unified format while using only narrative language requiring no coding expertise, we anticipate that our ChatGPT Chemistry Assistant will be very useful across various other chemistry subdisciplines.

Identifiers

PMID37548379
PMCPMC11073615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.