Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37547901›Full record

ReviewMethodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal2023

Blood Pressure Goals in Critically Ill Patients.

Karuna Puttur Rajkumar, Megan Henley Hicks, Bryan Marchant, Ashish K Khanna

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karuna Puttur RajkumarWake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3300-3067
Megan Henley HicksWake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6065-0310
Bryan MarchantWake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1984-5348
Ashish K KhannaWake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9083-891X

Funding

Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science AwardKL2TR001421 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MILLER, DAVID P · 2015 to 2023
$5.8M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood pressure goals in the intensive care unit (ICU) have been extensively investigated in large datasets and have been associated with various harm thresholds at or greater than a mean pressure of 65 mm Hg. While it is difficult to perform interventional randomized trials of blood pressure in the ICU, important evidence does not support defense of a higher pressure, except in retrospective database analyses. Perfusion pressure may be a more important target than mean pressure, even more so in the vulnerable patient population. In the cardiac ICU, blood pressure targets are tailored to specific cardiac pathophysiology and patient characteristics. Generally, the goal is to maintain adequate blood pressure within a certain range to support cardiac function and to ensure end organ perfusion. Individualized targets demand the use of both invasive and noninvasive monitoring modalities and frequent titration of medications and/or mechanical circulatory support where necessary. In this review, we aim to identify appropriate blood pressure targets in the ICU, recognizing special patient populations and outlining the risk factors and predictors of end organ failure.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessGoalsBlood PressureHumansIntensive Care UnitsRetrospective Studiesacute kidney injurycardiac functioncardiopulmonary bypasshypoperfusionintra-operative hypotensionmean arterial pressureperfusion pressureshock

Identifiers

PMID37547901
PMCPMC10402811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.