Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37547856›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2023

A Brief Peer-Led Intervention to Increase COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Among People Who Inject Drugs in San Diego County: Results From a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Steffanie A Strathdee, Daniela Abramovitz, Alicia Y Harvey-Vera, Tara Stamos-Buesig, Carlos F Vera, Irina Artamonova, Jenna Logan, Thomas L Patterson, Argentina E Servin, Angela R Bazzi

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05181657 (LinkUP), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05181657 nacompletednot on this map

LinkUP: COVID-19 Intervention for Underserved Populations Participating in Parent Study Proyecto La Frontera

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2022 to 2024Enrolled150ConditionsMotivational InterviewingArmsCOVID-19 education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Steffanie A StrathdeeSchool of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7724-691X
Daniela AbramovitzSchool of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2969-7193
Alicia Y Harvey-VeraSchool of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8708-8169
Tara Stamos-BuesigOnPoint, Harm Reduction Coalition of San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Carlos F VeraSchool of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Irina ArtamonovaSchool of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Jenna LoganOnPoint, Harm Reduction Coalition of San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Thomas L PattersonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2311-6164
Argentina E ServinHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5523-7767
Angela R BazziHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6828-1919

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the impact of a brief peer-led intervention on COVID-19 vaccination among people who inject drugs (PWID) presenting at syringe services program (SSP) locations in San Diego County, California. Methods: Between March and July 2022, PWID aged ≥18 years without recent voluntary COVID-19 testing who were not up to date on COVID-19 vaccinations received a single-session motivational interviewing intervention (LinkUP) or an attention-matched didactic control condition from trained peer counselors at SSP sites randomized by week. Following either 30-minute session, counselors offered referrals to local vaccination services. Multivariable log binomial regression via generalized estimating equations assessed LinkUP effects on (1) acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination referrals immediately postintervention and (2) COVID-19 vaccine uptake at 6-month follow-up. Results: COVID-19 vaccination outcomes were obtained on 135 (90.6%) of 149 participants. In multivariable analysis, participants receiving LinkUP had greater acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination referrals than controls (adjusted relative risk, 3.50; 95% CI, 1.01-12.2) and were marginally more likely to report receiving a new COVID-19 vaccine dose (adjusted relative risk, 1.57; 95% CI, .99-2.48). After 6 months, 20% reported receiving a new vaccine dose; however, if COVID-19 vaccine had been available at SSPs, this proportion could have been as high as 34.3% (45.3% LinkUP vs 24.3% control; Conclusions: A brief peer-led SSP-based intervention significantly improved COVID-19 vaccination among PWID. Further improvements could likely be obtained by supporting SSPs to offer COVID-19 vaccination on-site instead of relying on referrals. Clinical Trials Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05181657.

Indexed as

COVID-19harm reductionmotivational interviewingsubstance usevulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID37547856
PMCPMC10404005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.