Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37547821›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2023

Position-specific differences in countermovement vertical jump force-time metrics in professional male basketball players.

Dimitrije Cabarkapa, Nicolas M Philipp, Damjana V Cabarkapa, Andrew C Fry

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06254170 (Effect of Supplementation With Euterpe Edulis on the Physical and Mental Performance of Healthy Men Subjecting to Physical Exercise), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06254170 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Supplementation With Euterpe Edulis on the Physical and Mental Performance of Healthy Men Subjecting to Physical Exercise

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Vila VelhaRan2024 to 2024Enrolled20ConditionsClinical TrialArmsEuterpe Edulis juice, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Direct Versus Indirect Submaximal VOJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Recovery Methods in Basketball: A Systematic Review.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dimitrije CabarkapaDepartment of Health, Sport and Exercise Sciences, Jayhawk Athletic Performance Laboratory-Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States.
Nicolas M PhilippDepartment of Health, Sport and Exercise Sciences, Jayhawk Athletic Performance Laboratory-Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States.
Damjana V CabarkapaDepartment of Health, Sport and Exercise Sciences, Jayhawk Athletic Performance Laboratory-Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States.
Andrew C FryDepartment of Health, Sport and Exercise Sciences, Jayhawk Athletic Performance Laboratory-Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The countermovement vertical jump (CVJ) is one of the most commonly implemented non-invasive and time-efficient testing modalities for lower-body neuromuscular performance assessment. With more practitioners having access to portable force plates, the purpose of this study was to examine position-specific differences in CVJ force-time metrics within a cohort of elite professional male basketball athletes. Twenty-eight athletes competing in top-tier European basketball leagues volunteered to participate in the present study. Following familiarization with testing procedures and a standardized warm-up protocol, each athlete performed three maximal-effort CVJ on a uni-axial force plate system with hands on the hips during the entire movement. To minimize the possible influence of fatigue, each jump trial was separated by an approximately 15-s rest interval. The mean value across three jumps was used for performance analysis purposes. The findings of the present study reveal notable position-specific differences during the eccentric phase of the CVJ, with centers having greater braking impulse, mean force, and mean power when compared to guards. However, when normalized by body mass, the observed differences during the eccentric phase of the CVJ were nonexistent. On the other hand, no significant differences in absolute mean and peak force and power were detected during the concentric phase of the CVJ. Yet, when normalized by the player's body mass, centers demonstrated inferior performance than guards for the same force-time metrics. Overall, these findings may help practitioners obtain a better insight into position-specific differences with regards to CVJ force-time characteristics as well as aid with individually tailored training regimen design.

Indexed as

athletesbiomechanicskinematickineticmonitoringperformancetesting

Identifiers

PMID37547821
PMCPMC10398786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.