ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2023
Smart Glasses to Facilitate Ultrasound Guided Peripheral Intravenous Access in the Simulation Setting for Thai Emergency Medical Service Providers.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of smart glasses combined with ultrasound on radial arterial catheterization: a randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Trial
- The evolution and future of point of care ultrasound in the perioperative period: narrative review.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Review
- Smart glasses integrated with a wireless ultrasound system for radial artery catheterization in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The Effect of Using Smart Glasses Integrated Ultrasonography in Radial Artery Catheterization: A Prospective Randomized Trial.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2025Article
- Smart glasses for monitoring vital signs in anaesthesia care settings: a qualitative simulation study.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
- A systematic literature review on integrating AI-powered smart glasses into digital health management for proactive healthcare solutions.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- The diagnostic performance of automatic B-lines detection for evaluating pulmonary edema in the emergency department among novice point-of-care ultrasound practitioners.Emergency radiology · 2025Article
- Applications and indications of point-of-care ultrasound in emergency department encounters involving palliative care patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Integration of smart glasses in telementoring for simulated medical procedures.Acta cirurgica brasileira · 2025Article
- Smart Glasses with Augmented Reality Workflow; A Modern Tool for Triage in Mass Casualty Incidents.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Enhancing Emergency Medical Services with Smart Glasses Technology for Optimal Ambulance Positioning in Simulated Critical Patient Care Scenarios.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Automatic B-lines: a tool for minimizing time to diuretic administration in pulmonary edema patients in the emergency department of a developing country.International journal of emergency medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The ultrasound-guided peripheral venous access (USGPIV) was reported as difficult for novices to perform. Smart glasses equipped with teleconference systems can display real-time ultrasound images to sonographers and consultants which can increase the success rate of this procedure. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of employing smart glasses for USGPIV. Patients and Methods: A randomized, simulation study was conducted in emergency medical service (EMS) providers at Srinagarind Hospital, Thailand, from January to April 2023. We randomized participants into two groups which included participants who wore smart glasses during procedures requiring USGPIV (the smart glasses group) and participants who performed USGPIV with no smart glasses (the non-smart glasses group). After participating in USGPIV cannulation training, the simulations were carried out. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate, with secondary outcomes including the procedure time and subjective difficulty. Results: Fifty participants were recruited for the study. The smart glasses group was superior to the non-smart glasses group both in terms of first-attempt success rate with no statistically significant (64% vs 60%; P = 0.460) and also demonstrated a shorter procedure time than the non-smart glasses group (25.5 sec vs 42.3 sec; P = 0.003). The participants reported the subjective difficulty score was higher in the smart glasses group (the visual analog scale, VAS = 8). Conclusion: In simulation scenarios, the smart glasses-assisted USGPIV could shorten the procedure time. However, our study did not find significant differences in the first pass success rate of USGPIV between the two groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.