Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37547762›Full record

Trial reportOncology research2023

Neoadjuvant intermediate-course versus long-course chemoradiotherapy in T3-4/N0+ rectal cancer: Istanbul R-02 phase II randomized study.

Sukran Senyurek, Sezer Saglam, Esra Kaytan Saglam, Hakan Yanar, Kaan Gok, Didem Tastekin, Canan Koksal Akbas, Nergiz Dagoglu Sakin, Gulbiz Dagoglu Kartal, Emre Balik and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oncology research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sukran SenyurekDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, 34450, Türkiye.
Sezer SaglamDepartment of Medical Oncology, Demiroglu Bilim University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, 34394, Türkiye.
Esra Kaytan SaglamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul University Oncology Institute, Istanbul, 34093, Türkiye.
Hakan YanarDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, 34093, Türkiye.
Kaan GokDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, 34093, Türkiye.
Didem TastekinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istanbul University Oncology Institute, Istanbul, 34093, Türkiye.
Canan Koksal AkbasDepartment of Medical Physics, Istanbul University Oncology Institute, Istanbul, 34093, Türkiye.
Nergiz Dagoglu SakinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul University Oncology Institute, Istanbul, 34093, Türkiye.
Gulbiz Dagoglu KartalDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, 34093, Türkiye.
Emre BalikDepartment of General Surgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, 34450, Türkiye.
Metin KeskinDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, 34093, Türkiye.
Yasemin SanliDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, 34093, Türkiye.
Mine GulluogluDepartment of Pathology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, 34093, Türkiye.
Zuleyha AkgunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sisli Hospital, Istanbul, 34384, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation therapy (RT) is typically applied using one of two standard approaches for preoperative treatment of resectable locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): short-course RT (SC-RT) alone or long-course RT (LC-RT) with concurrent fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. The Phase II single-arm KROG 11-02 study using intermediate-course (IC) (33 Gy (Gray)/10 fr (fraction) with concurrent capecitabine) preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) demonstrated a pathologically complete response rate and a sphincter-sparing rate that were close to those of LC-CRT. The current trial aim to compare the pathological/oncological outcomes, toxicity, and quality of life results of LC-CRT and IC-CRT in cases of LARC. The prescribed dose was 33 Gy/10 fr for the IC-CRT group and 50.4 Gy/28 fr for the LC-CRT group. Concurrent chronomodulated capecitabine (Brunch regimen) 1650 mg/m

Indexed as

Quality of LifeRectal NeoplasmsAnal CanalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineChemoradiotherapyFluorouracilHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingOrgan Sparing TreatmentsTreatment OutcomeCapecitabineFluorouracilChemoradiotherapyNeoadjuvant therapyRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID37547762
PMCPMC10398395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.