Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37547672›Full record

ArticleAdvanced nanobiomed research2023

Unraveling the Relevance of Tissue-Specific Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Hydrogels for Vocal Fold Regenerative Biomaterials: A Comprehensive Proteomic and In Vitro Study.

Mika Brown, Shirley Zhu, Lorne Taylor, Maryam Tabrizian, Nicole Y K Li-Jessen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced nanobiomed research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Tissue compliance characterization for human umbilical arteries after decellularization.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mika BrownDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, McGill University 3655 Promenade Sir-William-Osler, Room 1003, Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada.
Shirley ZhuDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology 2001 McGill College Ave, 8th Floor, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1G1, Canada.
Lorne TaylorThe Proteomics Platform, McGill University Health Center 1001 Decarie Boulevard Montreal Suite E01.5056 Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Maryam TabrizianDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, McGill University 3655 Promenade Sir-William-Osler, Room 1003, Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada.
Nicole Y K Li-JessenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, McGill University 3655 Promenade Sir-William-Osler, Room 1003, Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada.

Funding

Bioprintable composite materials and microfluidic tools for vocal fold restoration and repairR01DC018577 · NIDCD · MCGILL UNIVERSITY · PI MONGEAU, LUC · 2021 to 2025
$2.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) is a promising material for tissue engineering applications. Tissue-specific dECM is often seen as a favorable material that recapitulates a native-like microenvironment for cellular remodeling. However, the minute quantity of dECM derivable from small organs like the vocal fold (VF) hampers manufacturing scalability. Small intestinal submucosa (SIS), a commercial product with proven regenerative capacity, may be a viable option for VF applications. This study aims to compare dECM hydrogels derived from SIS or VF tissue with respect to protein content and functionality using mass spectrometry-based proteomics and in vitro studies. Proteomic analysis reveals that VF and SIS dECM share 75% of core matrisome proteins. Although VF dECM proteins have greater overlap with native VF, SIS dECM shows less cross-sample variability. Following decellularization, significant reductions of soluble collagen (61%), elastin (81%), and hyaluronan (44%) are noted in VF dECM. SIS dECM contains comparable elastin and hyaluronan but 67% greater soluble collagen than VF dECM. Cells deposit more neo-collagen on SIS than VF-dECM hydrogels, whereas neo-elastin (~50 μg/scaffold) and neo-hyaluronan (~ 6 μg/scaffold) are comparable between the two hydrogels. Overall, SIS dECM possesses reasonably similar proteomic profile and regenerative capacity to VF dECM. SIS dECM is considered a promising alternative for dECM-derived biomaterials for VF regeneration.

Indexed as

biomaterialsdecellularized extracellular matrixneo-ECM depositionproteomicsvocal folds

Identifiers

PMID37547672
PMCPMC10398787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.