Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37547664›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction open2023

Spermatogenesis after gonadotoxic childhood treatment: follow-up of 12 patients.

E Delgouffe, A Braye, V Vloeberghs, I Mateizel, C Ernst, A Ferster, C Devalck, H Tournaye, I Gies, E Goossens

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04202094 (Follow-up of Fertility in Young Adults Who Did or Did Not Store Testicular Tissue Before Gonadotoxic Treatment for Fertility Preservation), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04202094 naenrolling by invitationnot on this map

Follow-up of Fertility in Young Adults Who Did or Did Not Store Testicular Tissue Before Gonadotoxic Treatment for Fertility Preservation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitair Ziekenhuis BrusselRan2020 to 2030Enrolled50ConditionsChildhood Cancer, Hematological DisordersArmsPhysical examination, Scrotum ultrasound, Blood sample, Semen analysis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

E DelgouffeDepartment of Reproduction, Genetics and Regenerative Medicine (RGRG), Biology of the Testis (BITE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5611-2173
A BrayeDepartment of Reproduction, Genetics and Regenerative Medicine (RGRG), Biology of the Testis (BITE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
V VloeberghsBrussels IVF, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7095-3996
I MateizelBrussels IVF, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium.
C ErnstDivision of Paediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium.
A FersterDepartment of Hemato-Oncology, Hôpital Universitaire des Enfants Reine Fabiola (HUDERF), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
C DevalckDepartment of Hemato-Oncology, Hôpital Universitaire des Enfants Reine Fabiola (HUDERF), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
H TournayeBrussels IVF, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium.
I GiesDivision of Paediatric Endocrinology, Department of Paediatrics, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
E GoossensDepartment of Reproduction, Genetics and Regenerative Medicine (RGRG), Biology of the Testis (BITE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7601-9689

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionWhat is the long-term impact of presumed gonadotoxic treatment during childhood on the patient's testicular function at adulthood? SUMMARY ANSWER: Although most patients showed low testicular volumes and some degree of reproductive hormone disruption 12.3 (2.3-21.0) years after gonadotoxic childhood therapy, active spermatogenesis was demonstrated in the semen sample of 8 out of the 12 patients. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In recent decades, experimental testicular tissue banking programmes have been set up to safeguard the future fertility of young boys requiring chemo- and/or radiotherapy with significant gonadotoxicity. Although the risk of azoospermia following such therapies is estimated to be high, only limited long-term data are available on the reproductive potential at adulthood. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This single-centre prospective cohort study was conducted between September 2020 and February 2023 and involved 12 adult patients. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING

methodsThis study was carried out in a tertiary care centre and included 12 young adults (18.1-28.3 years old) who had been offered testicular tissue banking prior to gonadotoxic treatment during childhood. All patients had a consultation and physical examination with a fertility specialist, a scrotal ultrasound to measure the testicular volumes and evaluate the testicular parenchyma, a blood test for assessment of reproductive hormones, and a semen analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Testicular tissue was banked prior to the gonadotoxic treatment for 10 out of the 12 included patients. Testicular volumes were low for 9 patients, and 10 patients showed some degree of reproductive hormone disruption. Remarkably, ongoing spermatogenesis was demonstrated in 8 patients at a median 12.3 (range 2.3-21.0) years post-treatment. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study had a limited sample size, making additional research with a larger study population necessary to verify these preliminary findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThese findings highlight the need for multicentric research with a larger study population to establish universal inclusion criteria for immature testicular tissue banking. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was conducted with financial support from the Research Programme of the Research Foundation-Flanders (G010918N), Kom Op Tegen Kanker, and Scientific Fund Willy Gepts (WFWG19-03). The authors declare no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04202094; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04202094?id=NCT04202094&draw=2&rank=1 This study was registered on 6 December 2019, and the first patient was enrolled on 8 September 2020.

Indexed as

cancerfertility preservationgonadotoxic treatmentmale infertilitytesticular tissue banking

Identifiers

PMID37547664
PMCPMC10403430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.