ArticleHuman reproduction open2023
Spermatogenesis after gonadotoxic childhood treatment: follow-up of 12 patients.
Article in Human reproduction open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04202094 (Follow-up of Fertility in Young Adults Who Did or Did Not Store Testicular Tissue Before Gonadotoxic Treatment for Fertility Preservation), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Follow-up of Fertility in Young Adults Who Did or Did Not Store Testicular Tissue Before Gonadotoxic Treatment for Fertility Preservation
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- ESHRE good practice recommendations on fertility preservation involving testicular tissue cryopreservation in children receiving gonadotoxic therapies†.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2025Guideline
- Pubertal Development Following Paediatric Gonadotoxic Treatment and Immature Testicular Tissue Banking.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A 20-year overview of fertility preservation in boys: new insights gained through a comprehensive international survey.Human reproduction open · 2024Article
- Endocrine disrupting chemicals and male fertility: from physiological to molecular effects.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionWhat is the long-term impact of presumed gonadotoxic treatment during childhood on the patient's testicular function at adulthood? SUMMARY ANSWER: Although most patients showed low testicular volumes and some degree of reproductive hormone disruption 12.3 (2.3-21.0) years after gonadotoxic childhood therapy, active spermatogenesis was demonstrated in the semen sample of 8 out of the 12 patients. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In recent decades, experimental testicular tissue banking programmes have been set up to safeguard the future fertility of young boys requiring chemo- and/or radiotherapy with significant gonadotoxicity. Although the risk of azoospermia following such therapies is estimated to be high, only limited long-term data are available on the reproductive potential at adulthood. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This single-centre prospective cohort study was conducted between September 2020 and February 2023 and involved 12 adult patients. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING
methodsThis study was carried out in a tertiary care centre and included 12 young adults (18.1-28.3 years old) who had been offered testicular tissue banking prior to gonadotoxic treatment during childhood. All patients had a consultation and physical examination with a fertility specialist, a scrotal ultrasound to measure the testicular volumes and evaluate the testicular parenchyma, a blood test for assessment of reproductive hormones, and a semen analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Testicular tissue was banked prior to the gonadotoxic treatment for 10 out of the 12 included patients. Testicular volumes were low for 9 patients, and 10 patients showed some degree of reproductive hormone disruption. Remarkably, ongoing spermatogenesis was demonstrated in 8 patients at a median 12.3 (range 2.3-21.0) years post-treatment. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study had a limited sample size, making additional research with a larger study population necessary to verify these preliminary findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsThese findings highlight the need for multicentric research with a larger study population to establish universal inclusion criteria for immature testicular tissue banking. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was conducted with financial support from the Research Programme of the Research Foundation-Flanders (G010918N), Kom Op Tegen Kanker, and Scientific Fund Willy Gepts (WFWG19-03). The authors declare no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04202094; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04202094?id=NCT04202094&draw=2&rank=1 This study was registered on 6 December 2019, and the first patient was enrolled on 8 September 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.