ReviewResuscitation plus2023
AI and machine learning in resuscitation: Ongoing research, new concepts, and key challenges.
Review in Resuscitation plus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- External validation of the Prehospital Return of Spontaneous Circulation (P-ROSC) score for predicting prehospital return of spontaneous circulation among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in resuscitation - transforming emergency care in the digital age.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Key physiological indicators and technological trends in physiology-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A narrative review.Resuscitation plus · 2026Review
- Leveraging AI and transfer learning to enhance out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcome prediction in diverse setting.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Genetic tests as prophecy: understanding self-defeating and self-fulfilling mechanisms in (predictive) genetic testing.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Review
- Fine-tuning of language models for automated structuring of medical exam reports to improve patient screening and analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular procedures: a bibliometric and visual analysis study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Revolutionizing Resuscitation Through Precision and Prediction - A Narrative Review.Vascular health and risk management · 2025Review
- Individualized decision making in on-scene resuscitation time for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using reinforcement learning.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- The Role of Large Language Models in Transforming Emergency Medicine: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- [Artificial intelligence in intensive care medicine].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence in respiratory care.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Review
- Explainable artificial intelligence in emergency medicine: an overview.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Discrepancies between Retrospective Review of "Real-Time" Electronic Health Record Documentation and Prospective Observer Documentation of In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Quality Metrics in an Academic Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Emergency Physicians: Creating Ripples, Expanding Domains, and Negotiating VUCA Situations.Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shockArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are important areas of computer science that have recently attracted attention for their application to medicine. However, as techniques continue to advance and become more complex, it is increasingly challenging for clinicians to stay abreast of the latest research. This overview aims to translate research concepts and potential concerns to healthcare professionals interested in applying AI and ML to resuscitation research but who are not experts in the field. Main text: We present various research including prediction models using structured and unstructured data, exploring treatment heterogeneity, reinforcement learning, language processing, and large-scale language models. These studies potentially offer valuable insights for optimizing treatment strategies and clinical workflows. However, implementing AI and ML in clinical settings presents its own set of challenges. The availability of high-quality and reliable data is crucial for developing accurate ML models. A rigorous validation process and the integration of ML into clinical practice is essential for practical implementation. We furthermore highlight the potential risks associated with self-fulfilling prophecies and feedback loops, emphasizing the importance of transparency, interpretability, and trustworthiness in AI and ML models. These issues need to be addressed in order to establish reliable and trustworthy AI and ML models. Conclusion: In this article, we overview concepts and examples of AI and ML research in the resuscitation field. Moving forward, appropriate understanding of ML and collaboration with relevant experts will be essential for researchers and clinicians to overcome the challenges and harness the full potential of AI and ML in resuscitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.