Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37547540›Full record

ReviewResuscitation plus2023

AI and machine learning in resuscitation: Ongoing research, new concepts, and key challenges.

Yohei Okada, Mayli Mertens, Nan Liu, Sean Shao Wei Lam, Marcus Eng Hock Ong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Resuscitation plus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Artificial intelligence in resuscitation - transforming emergency care in the digital age.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Artificial intelligence in intensive care medicine].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Review
  13. Artificial intelligence in respiratory care.Frontiers in digital health · 2024
    Review
  14. Explainable artificial intelligence in emergency medicine: an overview.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yohei OkadaDuke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Mayli MertensAntwerp Center for Responsible AI, Antwerp University, Belgium.
Nan LiuDuke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Sean Shao Wei LamDuke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Marcus Eng Hock OngDuke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are important areas of computer science that have recently attracted attention for their application to medicine. However, as techniques continue to advance and become more complex, it is increasingly challenging for clinicians to stay abreast of the latest research. This overview aims to translate research concepts and potential concerns to healthcare professionals interested in applying AI and ML to resuscitation research but who are not experts in the field. Main text: We present various research including prediction models using structured and unstructured data, exploring treatment heterogeneity, reinforcement learning, language processing, and large-scale language models. These studies potentially offer valuable insights for optimizing treatment strategies and clinical workflows. However, implementing AI and ML in clinical settings presents its own set of challenges. The availability of high-quality and reliable data is crucial for developing accurate ML models. A rigorous validation process and the integration of ML into clinical practice is essential for practical implementation. We furthermore highlight the potential risks associated with self-fulfilling prophecies and feedback loops, emphasizing the importance of transparency, interpretability, and trustworthiness in AI and ML models. These issues need to be addressed in order to establish reliable and trustworthy AI and ML models. Conclusion: In this article, we overview concepts and examples of AI and ML research in the resuscitation field. Moving forward, appropriate understanding of ML and collaboration with relevant experts will be essential for researchers and clinicians to overcome the challenges and harness the full potential of AI and ML in resuscitation.

Indexed as

Emergency medicineFeedback loopHeterogeneityLarge language modelNatural language processingPrediction modelSelf-fulfilling prophecy

Identifiers

PMID37547540
PMCPMC10400904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.