Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37547401›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023

Research on three-state reliability evaluation method of high reliability system based on multi-source prior information.

Jingde Huang, Zhangyu Huang, Xin Zhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jingde HuangGuangdong Intelligent Vision Precision Detection Engineering Technology Research Center, Zhuhai College of Science and Technology, Zhuhai, China.
Zhangyu HuangFaculty of Innovation Engineering, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China.
Xin ZhanSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Zhuhai College of Science and Technology, Zhuhai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A high reliability system has the characteristics of complexity, modularization, high cost and small sample size. Throughout the entire lifecycle of system development, storage and use, the high reliability requirements and the risk analysis form a direct contradiction with the testing expenses. In order to ensure the system, module or component maintains good reliability status and effectively reduces the cost of sampling tests, it is necessary to make full use of multi-source prior information to evaluate its reliability. Therefore, in order to evaluate the reliability of highly reliable equipment under the condition of a small sample size correctly, the equipment reliability evaluation model should be built based on multi-source prior information and form scientific computing methods to meet the needs of condition evaluation and fund assurance of high reliability system. In engineering practice, high reliability system or module gradually develops from normal state to failure state, generally going through three working states of "safety-potential failure-functional failure". Firstly, the historical test data under the three states can be used for the data source for the reliability evaluation of the system at the current stage, which supplements the deficiency of the field data; secondly, due to the lack of accurate judgment on the working state of a high reliability system or modules and analysis of the health status, the unnecessary maintenance may aggravate the evolution speed from potential failure to functional failure; thirdly, when high reliability system or module operates under overload or harsh conditions, the potential failure will be worsened to a certain extent. Aiming at the difficulty of multi-state system reliability evaluation, a reliability evaluation method based on non-information prior distribution is proposed by fusing multi-source prior information, which provides ideas and methods for reliability evaluation and optimization analysis of high reliability system or module. The results show that the three-state reliability evaluation method proposed in this article is consistent with the actual engineering situation, providing a scientific theoretical basis for preventive maintenance of high reliability system. At the same time, the research method not only helps evaluate the reliability state of a high reliability system accurately, but also achieves the goal of effectively reducing test costs with good economic benefits and engineering application value.

Indexed as

High reliability systemInformation fusionNo failure informationPrior informationReliability evaluationScientific computingThree-state system

Identifiers

PMID37547401
PMCPMC10403173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.