Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37547362›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2023

Neutrophil-to-monocyte ratio is the better new inflammatory marker associated with rheumatoid arthritis activity.

Jamil M A S Obaid, Malikah M A Almjydy, Maymouna A Q Garban, Fatima S Q Al-Hebari, Nusaibah A H Al-Washah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Isotopically enrichedScientific reports · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jamil M A S ObaidDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ibb University Ibb Yemen.ORCID 0000-0001-9742-2194
Malikah M A AlmjydyDepartment of Medical Microbiology Faculty of Science, Ibb University Ibb Yemen.
Maymouna A Q GarbanDepartment of Medical Microbiology Faculty of Science, Ibb University Ibb Yemen.
Fatima S Q Al-HebariDepartment of Medical Microbiology Faculty of Science, Ibb University Ibb Yemen.
Nusaibah A H Al-WashahDepartment of Medical Microbiology Faculty of Science, Ibb University Ibb Yemen.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease that chronically affects patients with episodes of inflammation. New inflammatory hematological markers were investigated for follow-up, such as the neutrophil-monocyte ratio (NMR), lymphocyte monocyte ratio (LMR), and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). This study was conducted to determine the most useful marker based on studies of association with RA disease activity and correlation with the classical markers C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and rheumatoid factor (RF). Methods: This case-control study included 62 chronic RA patients who had previously been diagnosed and experienced episodes of symptoms while attending a variety of public and private rheumatology clinics in Ibb City, Republic of Yemen, for the period of September 1 to November 30, 2021. Twenty healthy volunteers were included in this study. Complete blood count, CRP, ESR, and RF levels were measured in all participants. Results: The total leukocyte count, neutrophil count, platelet count, NMR, LMR, and NLR were positively correlated with CRP and ESR, but the monocyte count was reversed. The area under the curve (AUC = 0.861, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.769-0.948) for the NMR cutoff value of 4.7 was equal to that of CRP and close to that of ESR. This NMR cutoff value had 87% sensitivity and 80% specificity. LMR and NLR cutoff values of 4.35 and 1.35, respectively, resulted in AUCs of (AUC = 0.807, 95% CI, 0.708-0.905) and (AUC = 0.699, 95% CI, 0.571-0.819); their sensitivity and specificity were 62.3%, 90%, 57.4%, and 80%, respectively. Conclusions: As a convenient and low-cost inflammatory marker of RA activity, NMR outperformed LMR and NLR.

Indexed as

disease activityinflammationmarkerneutrophil‐monocyte ratiorheumatoid arthritissensitivityspecificity

Identifiers

PMID37547362
PMCPMC10397372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.