ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2023
Effect of vaginal microbiota on pregnancy outcomes of women from Northern China who conceived after IVF.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Reproductive tract and follicular fluid microbiota and probiotic interventions in IVF/ICSI outcomes: a systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Pooled it
- The Maternal Microbiome in Pregnancy: From Physiological Changes to Dysbiosis and Obstetrical Complications-Therapeutic Perspectives.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Clinical Applicability of Microbiota Sampling in a Subfertile Population: Urine versus Vagina.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Analysis of Vaginal Microbiota Variations in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy and Their Correlation with Preterm Birth: A Case-Control Study.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Assessing vaginal microbiome through Vaginal Microecology Evaluation System as a predictor forFrontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the correlation between vaginal microbiota and pregnancy outcomes of women who achieved pregnancy Methods: In total, 19 women from Northern China women who conceived after IVF and 6 women who conceived naturally were recruited in this study. The vaginal samples of the healthy participants were collected throughout pregnancy, that is, during the first, second, and third trimesters. The V3-V4 region of 16S rRNA was used to analyze the vaginal microbiome, and the bioinformatic analysis was performed using QIIME Alpha and Beta diversity analysis. Results: Either IVF group or Natural conception group, bacterial community diversities and total species number of vagnal samples from who delivered at term were significantly higher than those who delivered before term. Low abundance of vaginal bacteria indicates an increased risk of preterm delivery. Further, more abundant vaginal bacteria was found in first trimesters instead of the next two trimesters. Vignal samples collected during first trimester showed richer differences and more predictive value for pregnancy outcoes. In addition, the diversity of the vaginal bacterial community decreased as the gestational age increased, in all samples. Conclusions: Vaginal microbiota were more stable in women who conceived naturally and those who carried pregnancy to term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.