Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37547232›Full record

ArticleActa ortopedica brasileira2023

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF OPEN AND CLOSED FLOATING KNEE INJURIES.

Bahri Bozgeyik, Orhan Büyükbebeci, Savaş Güner, Ahmet Mert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bahri BozgeyikKadirli State Hospital, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osmaniye, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-9832-0648
Orhan BüyükbebeciGaziantep University Hospital, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gaziantep, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-9565-6739
Savaş GünerGaziantep University Hospital, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gaziantep, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-7191-9223
Ahmet MertÖmer Halis Demir Unıversity Hospital, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Niğde, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-5111-2051

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare the functional outcomes between floating knee injuries with open femur and tibia fractures and closed floating knee injuries. Methods: Floating knee injuries (followed up and treated in our clinic) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: floating knee injuries with open femur and tibia fractures (Group 1) and floating knee injuries with closed femur and tibia fractures (Group 2). Patients were compared according to their demographic characteristics and clinical and functional outcomes. Results: Of 52 study patients, 28 had Group 1 injuries and 24, Group 2 injuries. We found a statistically significant difference in length of hospital stay between the two groups (p Conclusion: Patients with floating knee injuries and open fractures showed poorer outcomes than those with closed fractures. Those with open floating knee injuries show complications more often and longer hospital stays.

Indexed as

FemurFractures, BoneKnee InjuriesTibia

Identifiers

PMID37547232
PMCPMC10399990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.