Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37547145›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation can improve the fixation of eyes rather than the fixation preference in children with autism spectrum disorder.

Li Tian, Shuai Ma, Yin Li, Meng-Fei Zhao, Chang Xu, Chen Wang, Xin Zhang, Lei Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Eye Tracking as a Treatment Monitoring Tool for Autism: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Li Tian *Tianjin Anding Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Shuai Ma *Department of Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Yin LiDepartment of Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Meng-Fei ZhaoDepartment of Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Chang XuDepartment of Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Chen WangDepartment of Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Xin ZhangDepartment of Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Lei GaoDepartment of Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been introduced into the intervention of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) as a possible new therapeutic option for modifying pathological neuroplasticity. However, the stimulating protocols of rTMS for ASD have not been approved unanimously, which affects the clinical popularization and application of rTMS. In addition, there is little research on the improvement of social processing of autistic children by rTMS. Methods: We explored the clinical efficacy of rTMS and improvement of face processing with the protocol of left high-frequency and right low-frequency on bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), with a sample of 45 ASD participants aged 2-18. Results: Our results showed that both the score on the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) and the fixations on the eyes of the human faces improved by two-session rTMS intervention, except for the percentage of eyes fixation. The mediation analysis indicated the item of "Adaptation to Change" of CARS mediated dominantly the improvement of eye-gaze behavior of ASD participants by rTMS. Conclusion: Our study revealed the mechanism of rTMS in improving the eye-gaze behavior of the autism population, deepened the understanding of the function of rTMS in treating autistic social disorders, and provided a reference for combined treatment for ASD.

Indexed as

autism spectrum disorders (ASD)dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)eye tracking (ET)mediation analysisrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

Identifiers

PMID37547145
PMCPMC10400712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.