ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2023
Comparison of the epidemiology of invasive pneumococcal disease between Australia and New Zealand in 2017-2021: an observational study based on surveillance data.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- From 10-Valent to 21-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines: Divergent Global Pathways and Future Directions for India.Indian pediatrics · 2026Review
- Genomic characterization of mobile genetic elements associated with antimicrobial resistance inMicrobial genomics · 2026Article
- Update on the evolving landscape of pneumococcal capsule types: new discoveries and way forward.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- The impact of pneumococcal serotype replacement on the effectiveness of a national immunization program: a population-based active surveillance cohort study in New Zealand.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Australian immunisation schedule uses 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13), while New Zealand (NZ) changed from PCV13 to 10-valent PCV (PCV10) in 2017. In NZ, cases of serotype 19A (not in PCV10) have been increasing since 2017. We compared invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) epidemiology between Australia and NZ in 2017-2021. Methods: We collated IPD notification data from national surveillance systems. Between Australia and NZ, we compared IPD incidence rates and assessed the proportion of serotype 19A, and stratified for ethnicity and age. Findings: Between 2017 and 2021, the crude IPD incidence per 100,000 in Australia ranged from 4.3 to 8.4, and ranged from 6.9 to 11.4 in NZ. The highest age-adjusted IPD rates were observed in Australian Indigenous people (range: 27.3-35.5) followed by NZ Māori/Pacific peoples (range 19.7-30.4). For children <2 years, ethnicity-adjusted IPD rates were similar between Australia and NZ in 2017-2020. In 2021, however, the ethnicity-adjusted incidence in children <2 years was higher in NZ (30.2; 95% CI 21.1-39.4) than in Australia (23.3 95% CI: 19.5-27.1) (p < 0.01). In Australia, the proportion of serotype 19A remained 5%, whereas in NZ serotype 19A increased from 11.5% to 29.5% with the largest increase in children <2 years and 2-4 years. Interpretation: Despite higher risks in Indigenous populations in Australia compared to all other groups, the overall IPD rate in NZ is increasing, particularly among children. The numbers and proportions of IPD due to serotype 19A are increasing in NZ especially in children. These data support the NZ decision from December 2022 to change to PCV13. Funding: This research received no specific funding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.