Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37547011›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Addressing persistent challenges in digital image analysis of cancerous tissues.

Sandhya Prabhakaran, Clarence Yapp, Gregory J Baker, Johanna Beyer, Young Hwan Chang, Allison L Creason, Robert Krueger, Jeremy Muhlich, Nathan Heath Patterson, Kevin Sidak and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Sandhya Prabhakaran
Clarence Yapp
Gregory J Baker
Johanna Beyer
Young Hwan Chang
Allison L Creason
Robert Krueger
Jeremy Muhlich
Nathan Heath Patterson
Kevin Sidak
Damir Sudar
Adam J Taylor
Luke Ternes
Jakob Troidl
Yubin Xie
Artem Sokolov
Darren R Tyson
Cell Imaging Hackathon 2022 Participants
Harvard University · USOregon Health & Science University · USHarvard University Press · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USSage Bionetworks · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Systems Pharmacology of Therapeutic and Adverse Responses to ImmuneCheckpoint and Small Molecule DrugsU54CA225088 · NCI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI SOKOLOV, ARTEM · 2018 to 2022
$10.8M
Understanding the Impact of Microscale and Nanoscale Heterogeneity and ResistanceU54CA209988 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DEMIR, EMEK, HEISER, LAURA MADELINE · 2017 to 2021
$10.3M
Omic and Multidimensional Spatial Atlas of Metastatic Breast CancerU2CCA233280 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI GOECKS, JEREMY · 2018 to 2023
$9.7M
Pre-cancer atlases of cutaneous and hematologic origin (PATCH Center)U2CCA233262 · NCI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI SANTAGATA, SANDRO · 2018 to 2023
$8.7M
Single-Cell Biology and Data Analysis Shared Resource (SCB-DA SR)U54CA217450 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI QUARANTA, VITO · 2018 to 2022
$8.5M
Research Specialist in Cancer Systems BiologyR50CA243783 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI TYSON, DARREN R · 2019 to 2023
$781k
NCI NIH HHS R50 CA243783NCI NIH HHS U2C CA233262NCI NIH HHS U2C CA233280NCI NIH HHS U54 CA209988NCI NIH HHS U54 CA217450NCI NIH HHS U54 CA225088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) supports many research programs and consortia, many of which use imaging as a major modality for characterizing cancerous tissue. A trans-consortia Image Analysis Working Group (IAWG) was established in 2019 with a mission to disseminate imaging-related work and foster collaborations. In 2022, the IAWG held a virtual hackathon focused on addressing challenges of analyzing high dimensional datasets from fixed cancerous tissues. Standard image processing techniques have automated feature extraction, but the next generation of imaging data requires more advanced methods to fully utilize the available information. In this perspective, we discuss current limitations of the automated analysis of multiplexed tissue images, the first steps toward deeper understanding of these limitations, what possible solutions have been developed, any new or refined approaches that were developed during the Image Analysis Hackathon 2022, and where further effort is required. The outstanding problems addressed in the hackathon fell into three main themes: 1) challenges to cell type classification and assessment, 2) translation and visual representation of spatial aspects of high dimensional data, and 3) scaling digital image analyses to large (multi-TB) datasets. We describe the rationale for each specific challenge and the progress made toward addressing it during the hackathon. We also suggest areas that would benefit from more focus and offer insight into broader challenges that the community will need to address as new technologies are developed and integrated into the broad range of image-based modalities and analytical resources already in use within the cancer research community.

Indexed as

artifact removalcancerdomain representationimage analysisMultiplexed imagesscalabilitythumbnail generation

Identifiers

PMID37547011
PMCPMC10401923
OpenAlexW4385189573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.