Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37546851›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

A dynamic generative model can extract interpretable oscillatory components from multichannel neurophysiological recordings.

Proloy Das, Mingjian He, Patrick L Purdon

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Proloy DasDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0002-8807-042X
Mingjian HeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Patrick L PurdonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Advanced signal processing methods for neural data analysis to support development of brain dynamic biomarkers for research and clinical applications in patients with Alzheimer's and related dementiasR01AG079345 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Patrick L. Purdon · 2023 to 2026
$5.0M
Noninvasive Low-cost Biomarkers for Preclinical Diagnosis and Longitudinal Tracking of Alzheimer's Disease Using Sleep and Resting State EEGR01AG054081 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DICKERSON, BRADFORD C, PRERAU, MICHAEL J · 2017 to 2021
$4.2M
The Aging Brain Under General Anesthesia: Neurophysiology, Neuroimaging Biomarkers of Aging and Alzheimer's Disease, and Post-Operative Cognitive OutcomesR01AG056015 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DICKERSON, BRADFORD C, PURDON, PATRICK L. · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054081NIA NIH HHS R01 AG056015NIA NIH HHS R01 AG079345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern neurophysiological recordings are performed using multichannel sensor arrays that are able to record activity in an increasingly high number of channels numbering in the 100's to 1000's. Often, underlying lower-dimensional patterns of activity are responsible for the observed dynamics, but these representations are difficult to reliably identify using existing methods that attempt to summarize multivariate relationships in a post-hoc manner from univariate analyses, or using current blind source separation methods. While such methods can reveal appealing patterns of activity, determining the number of components to include, assessing their statistical significance, and interpreting them requires extensive manual intervention and subjective judgement in practice. These difficulties with component selection and interpretation occur in large part because these methods lack a generative model for the underlying spatio-temporal dynamics. Here we describe a novel component analysis method anchored by a generative model where each source is described by a bio-physically inspired state space representation. The parameters governing this representation readily capture the oscillatory temporal dynamics of the components, so we refer to it as Oscillation Component Analysis (OCA). These parameters - the oscillatory properties, the component mixing weights at the sensors, and the number of oscillations - all are inferred in a data-driven fashion within a Bayesian framework employing an instance of the expectation maximization algorithm. We analyze high-dimensional electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography recordings from human studies to illustrate the potential utility of this method for neuroscience data.

Indexed as

Component analysisCortical OscillationDynamical modelsSource separationState space

Identifiers

PMID37546851
PMCPMC10402019
OpenAlexW4385333270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.