ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
Detection of viral infection in cell lines using ViralCellDetector.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cell lines are commonly used in research to study biology, including gene expression regulation, cancer progression, and drug responses. However, cross-contaminations with bacteria, mycoplasma, and viruses are common issues in cell line experiments. Detection of bacteria and mycoplasma infections in cell lines is relatively easy but identifying viral infections in cell lines is difficult. Currently, there are no established methods or tools available for detecting viral infections in cell lines. To address this challenge, we developed a tool called ViralCellDetector that detects viruses through mapping RNA-seq data to a library of virus genome. Using this tool, we observed that around 10% of experiments with the MCF7 cell line were likely infected with viruses. Furthermore, to facilitate the detection of samples with unknown sources of viral infection, we identified the differentially expressed genes involved in viral infection from two different cell lines and used these genes in a machine learning approach to classify infected samples based on the host response gene expression biomarkers. Our model reclassifies the infected and non-infected samples with an AUC of 0.91 and an accuracy of 0.93. Overall, our mapping- and marker-based approaches can detect viral infections in any cell line simply based on readily accessible RNA-seq data, allowing researchers to avoid the use of unintentionally infected cell lines in their studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.