Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37546686›Full record

ArticleACS omega2023

Application of Allometric Scaling to Nanochelator Pharmacokinetics.

Gregory Jones, Lingxue Zeng, Jonghan Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gregory JonesDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.
Lingxue ZengDepartment of Biomedical & Nutritional Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts 01854, United States.
Jonghan KimDepartment of Biomedical & Nutritional Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts 01854, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8226-7427
University of Massachusetts Lowell · USNortheastern University · US

Funding

Nanochelation Therapies for Iron Overload DisordersR01HL143020 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL · PI CHOI, HAK SOO, KIM, JONGHAN · 2018 to 2021
$2.6M
Long-Acting, Short-Residing Nanochelators for Iron Overload TherapyR01HL163273 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CHOI, HAK SOO, KIM, JONGHAN · 2023 to 2025
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL143020NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL163273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deferoxamine (DFO) is an effective FDA-approved iron chelator; however, its use is considerably limited by off-target toxicities and an extremely cumbersome dose regimen involving daily infusions. The recent development of a deferoxamine-based nanochelator (DFO-NP) with selective renal excretion has shown promise in ameliorating iron overload and associated physiological complications in rodent models with a substantially improved safety profile. While the dose- and administration route-dependent pharmacokinetics (PK) of DFO-NPs have been recently characterized, the optimized PK model was not validated, and the prior studies did not directly address the clinical translatability of DFO-NPs into humans. In the present work, these gaps were addressed by applying allometric scaling of DFO-NP PK in rats to predict those in mice and humans. First, this approach predicted serum concentration-time profiles of DFO-NPs, which were similar to those experimentally measured in mice, validating the nonlinear disposition and absorption models for DFO-NPs across the species. Subsequently, we explored the utility of allometric scaling by predicting the PK profile of DFO-NPs in humans under clinically relevant dosing schemes. These in silico efforts demonstrated that the novel nanochelator is expected to improve the PK of DFO when compared to standard infusion regimens of native DFO. Moreover, reasonable formulation strategies were identified and discussed for both early clinical development and more sophisticated formulation development.

Identifiers

PMID37546686
PMCPMC10399172
OpenAlexW4384698285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.