Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37546636›Full record

ArticleACS omega2023

Improvement of Ball Mill Performance in Recycled Ultrafine Graphite Waste Production for Carbon Block Applications.

Waroot Kanlayakan, Siraprapa Lhosupasirirat, Chonradee Amnatsin, Nattarut Verojpipath, Boonsueb Pragobjinda, Toemsak Srikhirin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Waroot KanlayakanSchool of Materials Science and Innovation, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1558-3996
Siraprapa LhosupasiriratSchool of Materials Science and Innovation, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.
Chonradee AmnatsinSchool of Materials Science and Innovation, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.
Nattarut VerojpipathThai Carbon & Graphite Co., Ltd., 15/2 Phutthamonthon Sai IV Road, Kratumban District, Samutsakorn 74130, Thailand.
Boonsueb PragobjindaThai Carbon & Graphite Co., Ltd., 15/2 Phutthamonthon Sai IV Road, Kratumban District, Samutsakorn 74130, Thailand.
Toemsak SrikhirinSchool of Materials Science and Innovation, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A carbon block is a carbonaceous material used in various applications such as bearings, mechanical seals, and electrical brushes. This work aims to fabricate carbon blocks from industrial graphite waste, a residue from the cutting and tooling process of graphite block production. The ball milling process was used to fabricate ultrafine graphite waste to enhance the packing of carbon blocks. The milling performance was profoundly affected by dispersing agents in which sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), lignosulfonate (LS), and mixed dispersant (LS-SDS) were applied. The results showed that LS-SDS had the best milling performance, the greatest grinding index, and a flowable slurry, indicating the potentiality of this formulation for the environmentally friendly manufacture of ultrafine graphite waste. Carbon blocks were prepared from oven-dried ultrafine graphite waste, which was mixed with amorphous carbon and pitch. This carbon mixture was formed a block by compaction before carbonization and impregnation. The density of the fabricated carbon blocks increased from 1.76 to 1.83 g/cm

Identifiers

PMID37546636
PMCPMC10398683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.