Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37546423›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2023

Research progress on deep learning in magnetic resonance imaging-based diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer: a review on the current status and perspectives.

Mingze He, Yu Cao, Changliang Chi, Xinyi Yang, Rzayev Ramin, Shuowen Wang, Guodong Yang, Otabek Mukhtorov, Liqun Zhang, Anton Kazantsev and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The value of habitat analysis based onBMC medical imaging · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mingze HeInstitute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Yu CaoI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Changliang ChiDepartment of Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin University (Lequn Branch), Changchun, Jilin, China.
Xinyi YangI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Rzayev RaminDepartment of Radiology, The Second University Clinic, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Shuowen WangI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Guodong YangI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Otabek MukhtorovRegional State Budgetary Health Care Institution, Kostroma Regional Clinical Hospital named after Korolev E.I. Avenue Mira, Kostroma, Russia.
Liqun ZhangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Anton KazantsevRegional State Budgetary Health Care Institution, Kostroma Regional Clinical Hospital named after Korolev E.I. Avenue Mira, Kostroma, Russia.
Mikhail EnikeevInstitute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Kebang HuDepartment of Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin University (Lequn Branch), Changchun, Jilin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has emerged as a first-line screening and diagnostic tool for prostate cancer, aiding in treatment selection and noninvasive radiotherapy guidance. However, the manual interpretation of MRI data is challenging and time-consuming, which may impact sensitivity and specificity. With recent technological advances, artificial intelligence (AI) in the form of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) based on MRI data has been applied to prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment. Among AI techniques, deep learning involving convolutional neural networks contributes to detection, segmentation, scoring, grading, and prognostic evaluation of prostate cancer. CAD systems have automatic operation, rapid processing, and accuracy, incorporating multiple sequences of multiparametric MRI data of the prostate gland into the deep learning model. Thus, they have become a research direction of great interest, especially in smart healthcare. This review highlights the current progress of deep learning technology in MRI-based diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. The key elements of deep learning-based MRI image processing in CAD systems and radiotherapy of prostate cancer are briefly described, making it understandable not only for radiologists but also for general physicians without specialized imaging interpretation training. Deep learning technology enables lesion identification, detection, and segmentation, grading and scoring of prostate cancer, and prediction of postoperative recurrence and prognostic outcomes. The diagnostic accuracy of deep learning can be improved by optimizing models and algorithms, expanding medical database resources, and combining multi-omics data and comprehensive analysis of various morphological data. Deep learning has the potential to become the key diagnostic method in prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment in the future.

Indexed as

computer-aided diagnosisdeep learningmachine learningprecision therapyprostate cancerradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID37546423
PMCPMC10400334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.