Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37546379›Full record

ArticleJournal of substance use2023

Gender Differences in Drug Use among Individuals Under Arrest.

Bridget E Weller, Stephen Magura, Dawn R Smith, Matthew M Saxton, Piyadarsha Amaratunga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of substance use, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bridget E WellerWestern Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2295-0707
Stephen MaguraWestern Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.
Dawn R SmithSubstance Abuse Council, Battle Creek, MI, U.S.A.
Matthew M SaxtonCalhoun County Sheriff's Office, Marshall, MI, U.S.A. at time of study.
Piyadarsha AmaratungaForensic Fluids Laboratories Inc., Kalamazoo. MI, U.S.A.

Funding

Advancing the Use of Oral Fluid to Monitor Therapeutic and Illicit Drugs in Outpatient Clinical and Field SettingsR01DA045733 · NIDA · WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY · PI MAGURA, STEPHEN · 2019 to 2020
$1.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA045733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Drug monitoring by drug testing of individuals under arrest provides an opportunity to detect drug use patterns within geographic areas. However, women have been omitted from large-scale monitoring efforts in criminal justice populations. The purpose of this study was to examine whether gender differences exist in drug use indicated by oral fluid collected in one U.S. jail. Methods: The study analyzed data collected in 2019-2020 from individuals under arrest (N = 191). Twenty-four percent of the sample identified as female. Oral fluid specimens were collected and then analyzed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Logit regression models examined gender differences. Results: Women were more likely to test positive for methamphetamines than men (41% versus 22%, OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.84). Significant gender differences were not found for other substances (marijuana, cocaine, and opioids), legality of drugs, or overall drug use. Conclusions: Because the National Institute on Drug Abuse aims to promote health equity, future drug monitoring in criminal justice populations should employ sampling approaches representing both women and men. This research would identify possible gender-based patterns of drug use and inform gender-based policies and clinical practices to prevent and treat drug misuse.

Indexed as

drug surveillanceenzyme-linked immunosorbent assayliquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometryoral fluid

Identifiers

PMID37546379
PMCPMC10398751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.