Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37546366›Full record

ArticleSocial networks2023

Shared Responsibility and Network Collaboration in Caregiving.

Melissa Zajdel, Krystyna R Keller, Lindsey Mountcastle, Laura M Koehly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social networks, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melissa ZajdelSocial Network Methods Section, Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute.
Krystyna R KellerSocial Network Methods Section, Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute.
Lindsey MountcastleSocial Network Methods Section, Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute.
Laura M KoehlySocial Network Methods Section, Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute.

Funding

Inherited Disease, Caregiving, and Social NetworksZIAHG200395 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KOEHLY, LAURA M · 2015 to 2025
$11.2M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HG200395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Communal coping may benefit caregivers, but most communal coping research focuses on dyads. Using an egocentric network design, we examine caregivers' we-talk-a linguistic marker of shared responsibility-and caregiver reports of 1) network member involvement in collaborative care roles and 2) met/unmet expectations across typically developing and rare disease contexts. We-talk was linked to involvement in direct care and support, but links of we-talk to decision-making varied based on network member closeness; we-talk was linked to meeting expectations for decision-making only. There were no differences across context, suggesting shared responsibility is linked to collaborative roles across caregiving contexts.

Indexed as

caregivingcollaborationcommunal copingsocial networkswe-talk

Identifiers

PMID37546366
PMCPMC10399706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.