Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37546285›Full record

ArticleObesity science & practice2023

Developing a long-term follow up service for bariatric surgical patients in the community: Patient and professional perspectives.

Yitka Graham, Ann Fox, Kamal Mahawar, Julie Parrott, Fadi Khalil, Catherine Hayes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity science & practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yitka GrahamFaculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing Helen McArdle Nursing and Care Research Institute University of Sunderland Sunderland UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6206-1461
Ann FoxFaculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing Helen McArdle Nursing and Care Research Institute University of Sunderland Sunderland UK.
Kamal MahawarFaculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing Helen McArdle Nursing and Care Research Institute University of Sunderland Sunderland UK.
Julie ParrottFaculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing Helen McArdle Nursing and Care Research Institute University of Sunderland Sunderland UK.
Fadi KhalilSunderland Clinical Commissioning Group Sunderland UK.
Catherine HayesFaculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing Helen McArdle Nursing and Care Research Institute University of Sunderland Sunderland UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the UK, bariatric surgical patients are followed up for 2 years post-operatively in hospital settings, before being discharged into General Practice for long-term follow-up. Presently, there is ambiguous guidance as to what should be included in a community-based bariatric surgical follow-up service. The aim of the study was to understand, from both patient and professional perspectives, what is needed to support the long-term management of bariatric surgical patients in community-based settings. Methods: Post-surgical bariatric patients and General Practice staff were recruited from an area in the UK which has an National Health Service (NHS) hospital providing a high-volume and established bariatric surgical service. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews. A thematic analytic framework was used to construct eight themes which illuminated the participants' experiences. The study took place between March and December 2021. Findings: Thirty participants (14 patients and 16 healthcare professionals) were recruited to the study. The study revealed the lack of a framework for delivery of a long-term follow up service was frustrating to both patients and professionals. Patient participants reported needing more support, especially dietetic and psychological input, and professionals stated they had little knowledge about bariatric surgical care, and what was needed to provide optimal care, but wanted to provide quality patient care. Conclusion: Long-term follow up of bariatric surgical patients is an important issue which needs addressing. This study illuminates both the patient and professional perspectives on developing a pragmatic, community-based service which meets the needs of patients and considers the need to incorporate such a service into existing infrastructures without adding additional demands on General Practice.

Indexed as

bariatric surgerycommunityGeneral Practicelong‐term follow uppatient perspectives

Identifiers

PMID37546285
PMCPMC10399522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.