Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37546208›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2023

Jigsaw Classroom: Perceptions of Students and Teachers.

Deepti Chopra, Gagandeep Kwatra, Bharti Bhandari, Jaspreet K Sidhu, Jayant Rai, C D Tripathi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Deepti ChopraAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh India.
Gagandeep KwatraAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh India.
Bharti BhandariAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh India.
Jaspreet K SidhuAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh India.
Jayant RaiAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh India.
C D TripathiAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Various innovative teaching methods have been designed in an attempt to provide millennial students an interactive and stimulating learning environment. A jigsaw method is one such form of cooperative learning that enables students to develop critical-thinking and ability for effective communication and promotes positive student attitudes toward their own learning. The present study was thus undertaken to introduce a jigsaw-based cooperative learning method and to understand the perception of the students and faculty. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study conducted among second year MBBS students. Students were randomly divided into 10 parent groups, with 10 students each. The topic was divided into 10 subtopics. Each student in the parent group was allotted a sub-topic. The students who were given the same sub-topic assembled to form an expert group. They interacted and discussed the subtopic. Students finally returned to their parent groups for peer teaching and presentation. A validated questionnaire was used to gather students and faculty feedback. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze responses to the Likert scale questions. Qualitative data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: The present study included 95 s year MBBS students. Majority (81%) students agreed that this teaching learning method enhanced their communication skills. Seventy-five percent of the students agreed that the activity helped in overcoming shyness and hesitation in the class. Overall the faculty also agreed that the jigsaw method was helpful for the students. Conclusions: Cooperative learning like jigsaw facilitates learning allowing student-student discussion, improving communication and teaching skills.

Indexed as

Innovative teachingInteractive teachingJigsawSelf-directed learningStudent-centered

Identifiers

PMID37546208
PMCPMC10403414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.