Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37546206›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2023

Teaching in the "New Normal": Using an Evidence-Based Process to Determine Should It Stay or Should It Go (SISoSIG).

Linda S Macaulay, Dina Kurzweil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Does Medical Education Require Radical Change?Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Linda S MacaulayHenry M. Jackson Foundation, in support of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Education & Technology Innovation Support Office, Bethesda, MD USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2954-2316
Dina KurzweilUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Education & Technology Innovation Support Office, Bethesda, MD USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2637-5129

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After pivoting to emergency remote instruction due to the COVID-19 pandemic, medical educators have added new techniques to their toolbox. As we welcome a "new normal," we may be able to teach even more effectively than we did before by adapting some of these techniques. This paper provides an evidence-based decision-making process for faculty to consider what should stay and what should go as they revise and enhance instruction from one semester to another. The SISoSIG process provides opportunities to reflect on lessons learned and discuss how to build on that learning to become even more effective practitioners.

Indexed as

COVID-19Decision-makingEvidence-based practicesMedical educationTeaching practices

Identifiers

PMID37546206
PMCPMC10403415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.