Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37546195›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2023

"It Changed How I Think"-Impact of Programmatic Assessment Upon Practicing Physicians: A Qualitative Study.

Jessica Greenfield, Kelli Qua, Richard A Prayson, S Beth Bierer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Assessment practices for dietetic students: An updated systematic review (2017-2024).Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Developing Self Care Digital Trainings for Cancer Patients: An Implementation Research Project with Broad Stakeholder Engagement.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Evidence-informed propositions for a whole-of-program assessment approach.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jessica GreenfieldUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine, Room 2008A Pinn Hall, Box 800866, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0366 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2723-5550
Kelli QuaCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9901-9307
Richard A PraysonDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA.
S Beth BiererCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7952-8822

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Programmatic assessment is a systematic approach used to document and assess learner performance. It offers learners frequent formative feedback from a variety of contexts and uses both high- and low-stakes assessments to determine student progress. Existing research has explored learner and faculty perceptions of programmatic assessment, reporting favorable impact on faculty understanding of the importance of assessment stakes and feedback to learners while students report the ability to establish and navigate towards goals and reflect on their performance. The Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine (CCLCM) of Case Western Reserve University adopted programmatic assessment methods at its inception. With more than 18 years' experience with programmatic assessment and a portfolio-based assessment system, CCLCM is well-positioned to explore its graduates' perceptions of their programmatic assessment experiences during and after medical school. In 2020, the investigators interviewed 26 of the 339 physician graduates. Participants were purposefully sampled to represent multiple class cohorts (2009-2019), clinical specialties, and practice locations. The investigators analyzed interview transcripts using thematic analysis informed by the frameworks of self-determination theory and professional identity formation. The authors identified themes and support each with participant quotes from the interviews. Based on findings, the investigators compiled a series of recommendations for other institutions who have already or plan to incorporate elements of programmatic assessment into their curricula. The authors concluded by discussing future directions for research and additional avenues of inquiry.

Indexed as

Competency-based medical educationProfessional identity formationProgrammatic assessmentSelf-determination theorySelf-regulated learningUndergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID37546195
PMCPMC10403454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.