Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37546193›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2023

Integrating Foundational and Clinical Science Remotely by Combining Team-Based Learning and Simulation.

Joel Roberts, Qing Zhong, Rachel Linger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joel RobertsMaster of Science in Biomedical Sciences Program, Rocky Vista University, Englewood, CO 80112 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0589-8118
Qing ZhongDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Rocky Vista University, Ivins, UT 84738 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2332-5820
Rachel LingerDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Rocky Vista University, Englewood, CO 80112 USA.ORCID 0009-0006-8286-4284

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrating foundational and clinical science in medical and other professional healthcare degree programs has been well established as a means to enhance learning. However, implementation remains challenging, and a significant gap exists in guidance for non-professional degree programs to effectively accomplish both types of integration. Additionally, many modalities described in the literature are resource-intensive, scale poorly to larger groups, and are widely inaccessible. We present an online modality combining team-based learning and a simulation-based learning experience that fosters vertical and horizontal integration of physiology, pharmacology, and clinical science. The tools utilized include a vital sign simulator, video conferencing software, and a document-sharing platform. The activity demonstrated improved knowledge comparing pre- and posttests and evidence that the activity helped students integrate physiology, pharmacology, and clinical medicine. The novel structure is effective and accessible, uses open-source software and standard equipment available to most undergraduate and graduate faculty, and is adaptable to in-person, hybrid-remote, and fully remote delivery. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-023-01817-9.

Indexed as

Health professions educationIntegrationInter-disciplinaryRemoteSimulationTeam-based learningVirtual

Identifiers

PMID37546193
PMCPMC10403461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.