ArticleCureus2023
Machine Learning-Based Approach to Predict Intrauterine Growth Restriction.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- The risk of late-onset fetal growth restriction and unfavorable neonatal outcomes among fetuses within the 10th-25th weight percentile: a prospective cohort study.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning model for identifying key risk factors in congenital heart disease prediction using questionnaire data: a retrospective case-control study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- The power of machine learning models in predicting gestational diabetes mellitus.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Modeling Factors Associated With Diarrhea Caused by Cryptosporidium Species Using Machine Learning Methods.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2026Article
- A Machine Learning Approach to Predicting Household Smoke Exposure Risk in Somalia: An Analysis With SHAP Explanations.Environmental health insights · 2026Article
- Article
- Developing a prognostic model for predicting preterm birth using a machine learning algorithm.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Interpretable Machine Learning for Predicting Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Gestational Diabetes: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Approach to Predict Emergency Cesarean Sections Among Nulliparous Women.Cureus · 2025Article
- Development of a machine learning model to identify the predictors of the neonatal intensive care unit admission.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Developing and validating an artificial intelligence-based application for predicting some pregnancy outcomes: a multi-phase study protocol.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Proposing a machine learning-based model for predicting nonreassuring fetal heart.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predicting mother and newborn skin-to-skin contact using a machine learning approach.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- An AI-based approach to predict delivery outcome based on measurable factors of pregnant mothers.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Identifying determinants and predicting cesarean section delivery among Bangladeshi women using machine learning: Insight from BDHS 2022 Data.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Machine learning: a new era for cardiovascular pregnancy physiology and cardio-obstetrics research.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024Review
- Early prediction of low birth weight using boosting ensemble machine learning: A retrospective cohort study.Digital healthArticle
- Artificial intelligence in maternal and child health: Current applications, translational gaps, and future research priorities.Women's health (London, England)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCreating a prediction model incorporating multiple risk factors for intrauterine growth restriction is vital. The current study employed a machine learning model to predict intrauterine growth restriction.
methodsThis cross-sectional study was carried out in a tertiary hospital in Bandar Abbas, Iran, from January 2020 to January 2022. Women with singleton pregnancies above the gestational age of 24 weeks who gave birth during the study period were included. Exclusion criteria included multiple pregnancies and fetal anomalies. Four statistical learning algorithms were used to build a predictive model: (1) Decision Tree Classification, (2) Random Forest Classification, (3) Deep Learning, and (4) the Gradient Boost Algorithm. The candidate predictors of intrauterine growth restriction for all models were chosen based on expert opinion and prior observational cohorts. To investigate the performance of each algorithm, some parameters, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, precision, and sensitivity, were assessed.
resultsOf 8683 women who gave birth during the study period, 712 were recorded as having intrauterine growth restriction, with a frequency of 8.19%. Comparing the performance parameters of different machine learning algorithms showed that among all four machine learning models, Deep Learning had the greatest performance to predict intrauterine growth restriction with an AUROC of 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.85-0.97). The importance of the variables revealed that drug addiction, previous history of intrauterine growth restriction, chronic hypertension, preeclampsia, maternal anemia, and COVID-19 were weighted factors in predicting intrauterine growth restriction.
conclusionsA machine learning model can be used to predict intrauterine growth restriction. The Deep Learning model is an accurate algorithm for predicting intrauterine growth restriction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.