Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37546140›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Machine Learning-Based Approach to Predict Intrauterine Growth Restriction.

Elham Taeidi, Amene Ranjbar, Farideh Montazeri, Vahid Mehrnoush, Fatemeh Darsareh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Machine learning: a new era for cardiovascular pregnancy physiology and cardio-obstetrics research.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elham TaeidiMother and Child Welfare Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, IRN.
Amene RanjbarFertility and Infertility Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, IRN.
Farideh MontazeriMother and Child Welfare Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, IRN.
Vahid MehrnoushMother and Child Welfare Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, IRN.
Fatemeh DarsarehMother and Child Welfare Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, IRN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCreating a prediction model incorporating multiple risk factors for intrauterine growth restriction is vital. The current study employed a machine learning model to predict intrauterine growth restriction.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was carried out in a tertiary hospital in Bandar Abbas, Iran, from January 2020 to January 2022. Women with singleton pregnancies above the gestational age of 24 weeks who gave birth during the study period were included. Exclusion criteria included multiple pregnancies and fetal anomalies. Four statistical learning algorithms were used to build a predictive model: (1) Decision Tree Classification, (2) Random Forest Classification, (3) Deep Learning, and (4) the Gradient Boost Algorithm. The candidate predictors of intrauterine growth restriction for all models were chosen based on expert opinion and prior observational cohorts. To investigate the performance of each algorithm, some parameters, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, precision, and sensitivity, were assessed.

resultsOf 8683 women who gave birth during the study period, 712 were recorded as having intrauterine growth restriction, with a frequency of 8.19%. Comparing the performance parameters of different machine learning algorithms showed that among all four machine learning models, Deep Learning had the greatest performance to predict intrauterine growth restriction with an AUROC of 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.85-0.97). The importance of the variables revealed that drug addiction, previous history of intrauterine growth restriction, chronic hypertension, preeclampsia, maternal anemia, and COVID-19 were weighted factors in predicting intrauterine growth restriction.

conclusionsA machine learning model can be used to predict intrauterine growth restriction. The Deep Learning model is an accurate algorithm for predicting intrauterine growth restriction.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedecision tree classificationdeep learningfetal growth restrictiongradient boost algorithmintrauterine growth restrictionintrauterine growth restriction (iugr)machine learningprenatal maternal screeningrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID37546140
PMCPMC10403995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.