ArticleCureus2023
Stereo-Electroencephalography-Recorded Interictal Epileptiform Discharges: Activation Pattern and Its Relationship With Surgical Outcome.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interictal waking and sleep electrophysiological properties of the thalamus in focal epilepsies.Brain communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Patients with drug-resistant epilepsy commonly undergo stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) intracranial monitoring for surgical evaluation. Our current practice of defining the epileptogenic zone relies heavily on recognizing the seizure onset zone (SOZ), but the clinical significance of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) is not well established. Methodology We retrospectively identified adult patients who underwent SEEG between January 2019 and May 2022. To study IED activation patterns, we classified IEDs as leading spikes (involved within the SOZ) and distant spikes (outside the SOZ). We calculated each patient's total number of brain subregions generating distant spikes. We correlated them with epilepsy type, duration, and surgical outcome (Engel I: good outcome and Engel II-IV: poor outcome). Results A total of 22 patients were identified during the study period, and 16 underwent surgical intervention (ablation or resection) with one-year post-surgery follow-up. The most common IED morphology was a single spike or sharp followed by periodic spikes or sharps. We found that 87% (n = 19/22) of leading spikes were activated during the first 24 hours of SEEG monitoring, whereas no activation pattern was observed for distant spikes. We found that a higher number of subregions generating distant spikes were associated with poor surgical outcomes (p = 0.002). However, we did not find any significant association between the number of subregions generating distant spikes with epilepsy duration (p = 0.67), temporal or extratemporal-onset epilepsy (p = 0.58), or the presence of an MRI lesion (p = 0.62). Conclusions IEDs involved within the SOZ were found to be activated during the first 24 hours of SEEG monitoring, which could aid in recognizing the pathological spikes and targeted mapping of the irritative zone. We also observed that a higher number of brain subregions generating IEDs outside the SOZ were associated with poor surgical outcomes, but this observation needs to be further studied with larger sample size prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.