Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37546039›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Profiles and Outcomes of Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the United States.

Oluwasegun A Akinyemi, Terhas Asfiha Weldeslase, Eunice Odusanya, Ngozi T Akueme, Ofure V Omokhodion, Mojisola E Fasokun, Deborah Makanjuola, Mary Fakorede, Temitayo Ogundipe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exosomal-complement system activation in preeclampsia.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2025
    Review
  8. Thymic inborn errors of immunity.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Oluwasegun A AkinyemiHealth Policy and Management, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, USA.
Terhas Asfiha WeldeslaseSurgery, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington DC, USA.
Eunice OdusanyaObstetrics and Gynecology, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington DC, USA.
Ngozi T AkuemeDermatology, University of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital (UNIMEDTH), Ondo State, NGA.
Ofure V OmokhodionObstetrics and Gynecology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, NGA.
Mojisola E FasokunEpidemiology and Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.
Deborah MakanjuolaPublic Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.
Mary FakoredeFamily Medicine, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington DC, USA.
Temitayo OgundipeCommunity and Family Medicine, Howard University Hospital, Washington DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a major contributor to adverse pregnancy outcomes both in the United States and globally. As the prevalence of obesity continues to rise, the incidence of GDM is anticipated to increase as well. Despite the significant impact of GDM on maternal and neonatal health, research examining the independent associations between GDM and adverse outcomes remains limited in the U.S. context. Objective This study aims to address this knowledge gap and further elucidate the relationship between GDM and maternal and neonatal health outcomes. Method We performed a retrospective study using data from the United States Vital Statistics Records, encompassing deliveries that occurred between January 2015 and December 2019. Our analysis aimed to establish the independent association between GDM and various adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. The multivariate analysis incorporated factors such as maternal socioeconomic demographics, preexisting comorbidities, and conditions during pregnancy to account for potential confounders and elucidate the relationship between GDM and the outcomes of interest. Result Between 2015 and 2019, there were 1,212,589 GDM-related deliveries, accounting for 6.3% of the 19,249,237 total deliveries during the study period. Among women with GDM, 46.4% were Non-Hispanic Whites, 11.4% were Non-Hispanic Blacks, 25.7% were Hispanics, and 16.5% belonged to other racial/ethnic groups. The median age of women with GDM was 31 years, with an interquartile range of 27-35 years. The cesarean section rate among these women was 46.5%. GDM was identified as an independent predictor of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, including cesarean section (OR=1.40; 95% CI: 1.39-1.40), maternal blood transfusion (OR=1.15; 95% CI: 1.12-1.18), intensive care unit admission (OR=1.16; 95% CI: 1.10-1.21), neonatal intensive care unit admission (OR=1.53; 95% CI: 1.52-1.54), assisted ventilation (OR=1.37; 95% CI: 1.35-1.39), and low 5-minute Apgar score (OR=1.01; 95% CI: 1.00-1.03). Conclusion GDM serves as an independent risk factor for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, emphasizing the importance of early detection and management in pregnant women.

Indexed as

epidermiologyfetal maternal outcomesgestational diabetes mellitus (gdm)profileunited states

Identifiers

PMID37546039
PMCPMC10399637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.