ArticleCureus2023
The Safety and Effectiveness of Decapeptide in Patients With Vitiligo: A Real-World Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 on Melanocyte Proliferation in Tissue-Engineered Skin Substitutes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Vitiligo: Pathogenesis and New and Emerging Treatments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Recent Advances in Management of Vitiligo.Indian journal of dermatologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Vitiligo, a chronic autoimmune depigmenting skin disease, affects a significant portion of the global population. One of the topical treatment options for vitiligo is basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF)-related decapeptide (bFGFrP) 0.1% solution. This study aimed to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of decapeptide in treating vitiligo. Methods This retrospective analysis utilized data collected from routine clinical practice in the management of vitiligo, focusing on patients treated with topical decapeptide lotion (Melgain™, manufactured by Zydus Healthcare Ltd., Ahmedabad, India). The primary outcome measures included the extent of re-pigmentation (EOR) and the grade of re-pigmentation (GOR) assessed at each follow-up visit. Results The analysis included data from 65 patients (24 males and 41 females) with an average age of 30.83 years. Segmental vitiligo was present in 52.31% of cases, with the face being the most commonly affected site. Among the patients, 33 received decapeptide as monotherapy, while 32 received decapeptide alongside adjuvant drug/phototherapy. The mean duration of treatment was five months. The first, second, and final follow-ups were observed to be at a mean of 45 days, two months, and five months, respectively. During the second and final follow-up, a significant response (>75% re-pigmentation) was observed in 12% (eight) and 71% (46) of the patients. A mild response (<50% re-pigmentation) was noted in 45% (29) of the patients during the first follow-up visit, 15% (10) during the second follow-up visit, and 6% (four) during the final follow-up visit. Grade 6 and 7 re-pigmentation occurred in a higher number of patients at the final visit, indicating treatment effectiveness. Overall, nearly all patients (96.92%) reported excellent tolerability of the decapeptide lotion based on the global assessment of tolerability. Conclusion This real-world study demonstrates that decapeptide promotes re-pigmentation and improves patient outcomes in vitiligo. Both decapeptide regimens, as monotherapy or in combination with other therapies, were effective and well tolerated by most patients. Thus, decapeptide represents a safe and effective therapeutic option for vitiligo treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.