ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2023
Evaluation of the clinical educational environment based on the DREEM model from the viewpoint of the OR students.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of educational environment at different academic levels using the Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of the combined LSPPDM and simulation teaching model in neonatal nursing intern training.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Investigating students' perceptions of the medical education environment and learning autonomy in blended learning in pediatrics: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe most important part of learning happens in the clinic. To determine the differences between the real educational environment and the desirable environment, the DREEM1 model is used. The present study was conducted to evaluate the clinical educational environment based on the DREEM model from the viewpoint of the OR2 students of the Lorestan University of Medical Sciences. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe present descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study evaluated the viewpoint of 118 students of operation room (OR) technology using the DREEM (Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure) questionnaire in the hospitals affiliated with the Lorestan University of Medical Sciences during the second semester of 2020. The DREEM questionnaire has 50 statements and is divided into five sections, which are rated on a five-point Likert scale (0-4). The data were analyzed using frequency distribution tables, mean and standard deviation indices, Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Data analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0. IBM Corp.; 2013. and the level of significance was set at 0.05.
resultsThe total perception of the students of the clinical educational environment was good and excellent in 73.8% of the cases and of the subscales was also good (50.8%-63.2%). There was a significant relation between the total score of students' perception of the clinical educational environment and age (
conclusionAccording to the results, the studied students had a positive perception of the clinical educational environment. It is recommended that the scientific foundation of the educators, the physical facilities of the operating rooms, and social communication should be strengthened to improve the care, treatment, and educational services. It will be useful to use the results to improve the accreditation level of medical centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.