Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37546015›Full record

ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2023

Awareness and acceptance of teleclinic services during COVID-19 in the general population in Riyadh: Cross-sectional study.

Hayat S Alzahrani, Sarah A Alharbi, Yara I Alsadan, Nouf S Alghosn, Sarah M Almazyad, Nowayer Alotaibi, Mohammed Almansour, Khaled K Aldossari, Eyad Demyati, Razan Y Abulreesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hayat S AlzahraniDepartment of Nursing, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Sarah A AlharbiPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Yara I AlsadanPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nouf S AlghosnPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sarah M AlmazyadPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nowayer AlotaibiPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AlmansourDepartment of Medical Education, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Khaled K AldossariFamily and Community Medicine Department, College of Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Eyad DemyatiConsultant in Family Medicine and Community Health Services Department, King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Razan Y AbulreeshDepartment of Nursing, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe first COVID-19 case in Saudi Arabia was reported on March 2, 2020. The Saudi government introduced the "937" service number as one of the telemedicine services for COVID-19 information. Telemedicine uses telecommunication and information technologies in the medical field to deliver healthcare services and improve patients' health status. This study aims to estimate the frequency of teleclinics usage during COVID-19, assess awareness of teleclinics, and assess acceptance of teleclinics during COVID-19 in the Saudi population. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe cross-sectional study used a convenient sample encompassing the 1,583 Saudi and non-Saudi adult population of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and was conducted online between August 2020 and April 2021. A self-administrated online questionnaire was distributed to all participants and data were collected on sociodemographics, knowledge of use of teleclinics, and its acceptance. Analysis of quantitative data by

resultsMost (92.5%) participants were female and had a university education (65.9%). The main reason for using teleclinic was experiencing a new complaint (27.3%), next, for medications refill (13.2%), with COVID-19-related issues being the least common reason for using teleclinic (8.2%). The result shows that 77.1% of participants had a good level of acceptance of teleclinic. The regression analysis showed that number of teleclinics utilization, as an advantage it is more convenient, and recommending this service to someone else was significantly associated with acceptance of teleclinics in future.

conclusionAs per the findings, the experience of using teleclinic positively impacts the level of acceptance of teleclinic among the population. The adoption of telemedicine for healthcare delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic helped limit the spread of the infection and reduce the risk of exposure to COVID-19 for both patients and healthcare providers. In the future, telemedicine can be used as an alternative to minor complaints and follow-up checkups. In this way, the burden of healthcare system can also be overcome.

Indexed as

AcceptanceawarenessCOVID-19teleclinic

Identifiers

PMID37546015
PMCPMC10402800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.