ArticleJAMIA open2023
Utilization of electronic health records and associated factors among nurses in a faith-based teaching hospital, Ilishan, Nigeria.
Article in JAMIA open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating digital health technologies into the healthcare system: Challenges and opportunities in Nigeria.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Exploring user experiences of clinicians engaged with the digital healthcare interventions across the referral and university teaching hospitals in Nigeria: a qualitative study.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Impact of Implementing Electronic Nursing Records on Quality and Safety Indicators in Care.The Libyan journal of medicine · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: It has been documented that nurses' use of electronic health records (EHRs) impacts clients' health outcomes positively. Some health facilities, primarily privately owned institutions, introduced EHRs for optimal healthcare. Evidence of such and associated factors among nurses must be documented to improve utilization and quality. Objective: The study assessed the utilization of EHRs and associated factors among nurses in a faith-based teaching hospital. Materials and Methods: This sequential explanatory mixed-methods study involved a sample of all 240 nurses from a teaching hospital where EHRs have been introduced. Quantitative data through semistructured questionnaires were collected and analyzed using Chi-square and logistic regression. Qualitative data were collected from 10 purposively selected nurses using an in-depth interview guide and analyzed through content analysis. Results: The majority of participants reported availability of EHR computer software (62.8%), internet facility (84.2%), and desktops (76.3%), but EHR was poorly utilized (27.3%). Factors significantly associated were nurses who were females [OR (odds ratio) = 1.5, 95% CI (confidence interval), 0.21-11.24], BNSc degrees holders [OR = 4.3; 95% CI, 1.06-17.43]; had computer EHR software [OR = 7.4, 95% CI, 0.83-3.81], and sponsored EHR training [OR = 2.10; 95% CI, 0.24-18.6]. Noncapturing of nursing tasks and nursing standardized language by EHR software, lack of institutional enforcement on EHR use, and absence of clear EHR policies were the main identified themes for the key barriers to using EHRs. Conclusion: EHR was poorly utilized among nurses. Gender, educational qualification, EHR resources, and sponsored training were factors significantly associated with the use. There is an urgent need for comprehensive EHR packages, sustained sponsored training, and formulation of EHR policy for effective EHR implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.