Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37545971›Full record

ArticleAfrican health sciences2023

Laboratory characteristics among patients with COVID-19: a single-center experience from Khartoum, Sudan.

Elmigdad Abdelgadir Ali Mohamed, Khilood Seddiq Ahmed Mohamed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elmigdad Abdelgadir Ali MohamedAlghad International Colleges for Applied Medical Sciences, Educational and Academic Affairs.
Khilood Seddiq Ahmed MohamedSudan International University, Faculty of Medical Laboratory Sciences.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: COVID19 is associated with a number of laboratory characteristics and changes with different levels of prognostic significance. We report changes in lab findings between severe and non-severe COVID-19 in patients that had molecular testing of nasopharyngeal swabs in Khartoum, Sudan. Material and Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study, conducted from Jan to May 2021. It included 66 preidentified COVID19 patients who attended the isolation center at Jabra Hospital in Khartoum the capital city of Sudan. Participants were enrolled for CBC, D-dimer and C-Reactive Protein testing. Among these participants, 21(31.8%) had severe COVID19 pneumonia.. Data were analysed using SPSS version 24, and the independent sample t-test was used to compare severe and non-sever cases. Results: The mean values for all cases showed a mild decrease in Hb (9.53±1.83 g/dl), MCHC (28.3±2.91 g/dl); lymphocytes % (19.8 ±6.82); increased RDW-SD (50.1±5.70 fL), D-dimer (4.2±3.73 µg/ml) and CRP (107.2±61.21 mg/dl). There were significant d/span>differences in the laboratory findings between severe and non-severe COVID-19 cases in total WBCs (p value = .001), lymphocyte % (p value = .000), neutrophil % (p value=.038), RDW-SD (p value = .044), D-dimer (p value = .029) and CRP (p value = .044). Conclusion: The laboratory findings of CBC, D-dimer and CRP provide an essential contribution to predicti COVID-19 severity and prognosis.

Indexed as

COVID-19BiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesSudanBiomarkersCBCCOVID-19CRPD-dimerSudan

Identifiers

PMID37545971
PMCPMC10398487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.