Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37545851›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2023

A Systematic Review of Patient Race, Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Educational Attainment in Prostate Cancer Treatment Randomised Trials-Is the Evidence Base Applicable to the General Patient Population?

Siddhant Patki, Julian Aquilina, Rebecca Thorne, Isaac Aristidou, Filipe Brogueira Rodrigues, Hannah Warren, Axel Bex, Veeru Kasivisvanathan, Caroline Moore, Kurinchi Gurusamy and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Association of marginalization and PSMA-PET in prostate cancer An analysis of the Ontario PSMA-PET Registry for Recurrent Prostate Cancer.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Siddhant PatkiImperial College Medical School, London, UK.
Julian AquilinaUniversity College London Medical School, London, UK.
Rebecca ThorneThe Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Isaac AristidouNorth Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
Filipe Brogueira RodriguesUniversity College London Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK.
Hannah WarrenUniversity College London Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK.
Axel BexUniversity College London Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK.
Veeru KasivisvanathanUniversity College London Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK.
Caroline MooreUniversity College London Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK.
Kurinchi GurusamyUniversity College London Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK.
Mark EmbertonUniversity College London Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK.
Lawrence M J BestNorthern Care Alliance NHS Trust, Salford, UK.
Maxine G B TranUniversity College London Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Prostate cancer (PC) disproportionately affects men of Black race, and lower educational and socioeconomic status. Guidelines are based on randomised controlled trials (RCTs); however, the representation of different races, educations, and socioeconomic backgrounds in these trials is unclear. Objective: To assess reporting of equality, diversity, and inclusion characteristics (Equality, Diversity and Inclusion [EDI]) and differences in treatment effects between different races, and educational or socioeconomic status. Evidence acquisition: We conducted a systematic review of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase in April 2020 examining RCTs investigating treatments for PC. Outcomes collected were race/ethnicity, educational attainment, and socioeconomic status. RCTs investigating PC treatment in any population or setting were included. Data extraction of characteristics was performed independently by pairs of reviewers and checked by a senior author. The Cochrane risk of bias tool assessed the quality of included papers. Evidence synthesis: A total of 265 trials were included, and 138 of these were available as full-text articles. Fifty-four trials including 19 039 participants reported any EDI data. All 54 trials reported race, 11 reported ethnicity, three reported educational attainment, and one reported socioeconomic status. Patients of White race were the majority of the recruited population (82.6%), while the minority prevalence was as follows: Black 9.8% and Asian 5.7%. Three studies reported mortality outcomes depending on the participant's race. All three studies investigated different treatments, so a meta-analysis was not performed. No studies reported outcomes stratified by the educational or socioeconomic status of participants. Conclusions: There is poor reporting of patient race, ethnicity, socioeconomic background, and educational attainment in RCTs for PC treatments between 2010 and 2020. Addressing this for future studies will help explain differences in the incidence of and mortality from PC and improve the generalisability of results. Patient summary: In this study, we reviewed prostate cancer treatment trials to see whether these reported race, education, and socioeconomic backgrounds of their patient populations. We conclude that reporting of these characteristics is poor. This needs to be improved in future to improve outcomes for patients with prostate cancer of all ethnical, racial, and socioeconomic groups.

Indexed as

DisparityEducationNeoplasmProstateRaceRandomised controlled trialSocioeconomicSystematic

Identifiers

PMID37545851
PMCPMC10403690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.