ArticlePostepy dermatologii i alergologii2023
Spitz nevus and melanoma: evaluation with dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy.
Article in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Spitz nevi (SN) include a wide range of benign melanocytic nevi, which are controversial due to their morphologic resemblance to melanoma (MM). Aim: To describe dermoscopic and reflectance confocal microscopic (RCM) features of SN compared to MM and assess the RCM utility in the differential diagnosis. Material and methods: We performed a multicentre retrospective analysis of MM and SN evaluated with dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy. Three RCM mosaics were obtained for each lesion. Nine dermoscopic and twenty-one microscopic features were assessed for each lesion. Results: A total of 26 lesions (15 SN and 11 MM) were included. Dermoscopically, most SN showed a "starburst" pattern. Asymmetry was marked in 8 MM. There were 6 dermoscopic features significantly more prevalent in MM than in SN. RCM showed that an atypical honeycomb pattern, atypical infiltration, and disarray of the epidermis were significant for MM. SN mostly revealed a typical honeycomb pattern. At the DEJ, most of SN had a meshwork pattern; MM revealed an atypical meshwork pattern. Atypical cells and sheet-like structures were observed in most MM. Conclusions: A combined approach using dermoscopy and RCM supports the differential diagnosis of SN and MM. Although our study showed some significant differences between SN and MM in RCM, further research on a larger group should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.