Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37545771›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nursing sciences2023

A concept analysis of routines for improving health behaviors.

Sunny Y Ruggeri, Amanda Emerson, Cynthia L Russell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nursing sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Finding the Extraordinary in the Ordinary: Understanding the Role of Everyday Life in Coping With Health Challenges.Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals · 2025
    Article
  3. In-home respite care in dementia: An evolutionary concept analysis.International journal of nursing sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sunny Y RuggeriSchool of Nursing and Health Studies, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Amanda EmersonUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, University of Kansas School of Nursing, Kansas, USA.
Cynthia L RussellSchool of Nursing and Health Studies, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Missouri, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Chronic disease patients often have unhealthy routines, especially when away from health care professionals. These patients need clear guidance about establishing and maintaining routines. This study aimed to synthesize a definition of the concept of routines for improving health behaviors based on its uses in the literature. Methods: We searched CINAHL, Medline, Scopus, and Google Scholar from January to May, 2022 for articles that included definitions of routines in the context of improving health behavior. We applied no date restriction. The systematic analytic method and Rodgers' evolutionary concept analysis method were used. We charted the attributes, antecedents, and consequences of routines for improving health behaviors, analyzed their uses in the literature, and synthesized the results in a definition of the concept. Result: At total of 24 articles were included. Attributes of the concept were repeated patterns, controllable by the patient, goal-oriented health, and integration into an overarching lifestyle. Antecedents were individual characteristics and environmental factors. Consequences were psychological, physical, and social well-being at individual and environmental levels. Conclusion: This clarified definition of routines for improving health behaviors will provide a starting point for future research and, eventually, a basis for clinical nursing interventions to support patients in developing and maintaining healthy routines to promote better patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Chronic diseaseHealth behaviorsPatientsQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID37545771
PMCPMC10401352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.