ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2023
Factors influencing evidence-based practice among undergraduate nursing students: A cross-sectional analysis.
Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nursing Students' Experiences of Learning Evidence-Based Practice Through a Flipped Classroom: A Qualitative Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Predicting the adoption of evidence-based practice (EBP) based on critical thinking levels among nursing students.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Undergraduate nursing students' experiences with evidence-based practice during clinical internship: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Undergraduate health sciences students' perceptions and practices of evidence-based practice: a cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Evidence-based practice competencies and associated determinants among undergraduate nursing students in Sri Lanka: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Transitioning to competency-based education in nursing: a scoping review of curriculum review and revision strategies.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Factors associated with beliefs and implementation of evidence-based practice among nurses: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practice Competency among Greek Undergraduate Nursing Students.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Nursing Students' Information Seeking Behavior in Saudi Arabia: A Mixed-Method Study.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to describe the current situation of evidence-based practice (EBP) among undergraduate nursing students in Thailand. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted. A convenience sample of 470 third- and fourth-year undergraduate nursing students from five public universities across Thailand participated in this study from January 2021 to March 2021. All participants were invited to complete a general information questionnaire, and the Student Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (S-EBPQ). Results: The overall mean S-EBPQ score was 5.29 ± 0.71, and the four subscales, from highest to lowest, were attitudes (5.50 ± 0.93), sharing and applying EBP (5.37 ± 0.87), practice (5.18 ± 0.84), and retrieving and reviewing evidence (5.10 ± 0.81). The current situation of S-EBPQ was higher among nursing students who had higher previous EBP studies, familiarity with research methods, confidence in clinical decision-making, preparedness in practice, and access to journals ( Conclusions: This study's findings provide valuable insights for planning strategies that can be integrated into the existing nursing curricula to enhance nursing undergraduates' EBP application in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.