ArticleDigital health
A survey of the knowledge, perceptions of and attitudes to digital health of healthcare professionals in 14 Bulgarian hospitals: First large-scale study on digital health in Bulgarian inpatient facilities.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the knowledge, perceptions of and attitudes to digital health of Bulgarian hospital professionals in the first study of digital health in this professional group. Methods: A paper-based questionnaire was administered to doctors, trainee doctors, nurses, midwives, and laboratory assistants working in multiprofile or specialized hospitals. Topics included the following: state, objectives, benefits, and future of digital health; data storage, access, security, and sharing; main software used; patient-held Personal Information System (PIS); and telemedicine. A total of 1187 participants from 14 hospitals completed the survey in two phases: September 2013-April 2014 and May 2015-April 2017. Data were analyzed through descriptive statistics and multilevel logistic regression. Results: Three-quarters of participants evaluated the state of development of digital health in Bulgaria as subpar (36.0% negative; 38.9% passable; 24.5% positive). 27.2% (323) endorsed patients having unconditional access to their data. In contrast, 89.5% (1062) of participants considered it appropriate to have full access to patient data recorded by colleagues. Doctors were more likely to endorse patients having access to their data than healthcare specialists (OR = 1.79 at facility, OR = 1.77 at location). Conclusion: The largely negative or lukewarm attitudes toward the state of development of digital health in Bulgaria are likely to result from the high number of failed projects, unmet expectations, misunderstood benefits, and unforeseen challenges. This study provides a much-needed stimulus and baseline for researching the ways in which the digital health landscape in Bulgaria has matured-or not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.