Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37545312›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2023

Metacognitive awareness in the sound-induced flash illusion.

Randolph Maynes, Ryan Faulkner, Grace Callahan, Callie E Mims, Saurabh Ranjan, Justine Stalzer, Brian Odegaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Conscious awareness, sensory integration, and evidence accumulation in bodily self-perception.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. How the brain controls decision making in a multisensory world.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Randolph MaynesUniversity of Florida, 945 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32603, USA.
Ryan FaulknerUniversity of Florida, 945 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32603, USA.
Grace CallahanUniversity of Florida, 945 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32603, USA.
Callie E MimsUniversity of Florida, 945 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32603, USA.
Saurabh RanjanUniversity of Florida, 945 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32603, USA.
Justine StalzerUniversity of Florida, 945 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32603, USA.
Brian OdegaardUniversity of Florida, 945 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32603, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5459-1884

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hundreds (if not thousands) of multisensory studies provide evidence that the human brain can integrate temporally and spatially discrepant stimuli from distinct modalities into a singular event. This process of multisensory integration is usually portrayed in the scientific literature as contributing to our integrated, coherent perceptual reality. However, missing from this account is an answer to a simple question: how do confidence judgements compare between multisensory information that is integrated across multiple sources, and multisensory information that comes from a single, congruent source in the environment? In this paper, we use the sound-induced flash illusion to investigate if confidence judgements are similar across multisensory conditions when the numbers of auditory and visual events are the same, and the numbers of auditory and visual events are different. Results showed that congruent audiovisual stimuli produced higher confidence than incongruent audiovisual stimuli, even when the perceptual report was matched across the two conditions. Integrating these behavioural findings with recent neuroimaging and theoretical work, we discuss the role that prefrontal cortex may play in metacognition, multisensory causal inference and sensory source monitoring in general. This article is part of the theme issue 'Decision and control processes in multisensory perception'.

Indexed as

IllusionsMetacognitionAcoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionBrainHumansPhotic StimulationVisual Perceptionmetacognitionmultisensory integrationsound-induced flash illusion

Identifiers

PMID37545312
PMCPMC10404924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.