ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2023
Multisensory causal inference is feature-specific, not object-based.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Crossmodal interaction of flashes and beeps across time and number follows Bayesian causal inference.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
- Humans use underestimates of auditory spatial and temporal uncertainty for perceptual inference.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Precision-based causal inference modulates audiovisual temporal recalibration.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Audiovisual simultaneity windows reflect temporal sensory uncertainty.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Article
- Multisensory causal inference is feature-specific, not object-based.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Article
- How the brain controls decision making in a multisensory world.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multisensory integration depends on causal inference about the sensory signals. We tested whether implicit causal-inference judgements pertain to entire objects or focus on task-relevant object features. Participants in our study judged virtual visual, haptic and visual-haptic surfaces with respect to two features-slant and roughness-against an internal standard in a two-alternative forced-choice task. Modelling of participants' responses revealed that the degree to which their perceptual judgements were based on integrated visual-haptic information varied unsystematically across features. For example, a perceived mismatch between visual and haptic roughness would not deter the observer from integrating visual and haptic slant. These results indicate that participants based their perceptual judgements on a feature-specific selection of information, suggesting that multisensory causal inference proceeds not at the object level but at the level of single object features. This article is part of the theme issue 'Decision and control processes in multisensory perception'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.