Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37545073›Full record

ArticleSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition2023

[Application of Midline Catheter Placed Under Ultrasound Guidance in Intravenous Therapy for Oral and Maxillofacial Tumor].

Qiuyu Huang, Weiqin Wu, Xingfang He, Yijun Deng, Yinyan Chen, Wenzhen Gu

Open access · greenAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qiuyu HuangDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Institute of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510055, China.
Weiqin WuDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Institute of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510055, China.
Xingfang HeDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Institute of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510055, China.
Yijun DengDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Institute of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510055, China.
Yinyan ChenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Institute of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510055, China.
Wenzhen GuDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Institute of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510055, China.
Stomatology Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To examine the application effect of ultrasound-guided placement of midline catheter and to select the appropriate placement method of intravenous catheter for patients with oral and maxillofacial tumors. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the general data and venous catheter-related information of 143 oral and maxillofacial tumor patients who received treatment between June 2019 and December 2021. There were two patient groups, a control group of patients with inserted peripheral venous catheters (PVC) and an observation group of patients with midline catheters placed under ultrasound guidance. We made a comparative analysis of the incidence of catheter-related complications, including bleeding at the insertion site, phlebitis, catheter blockage, extravasation, etc., in the two groups. When the baseline data from the two groups were not balanced, we used propensity score matching (PSM) to match the general data before comparing the complication incidence between the two groups. Results: There were 71 patients who underwent 215 times of PVC placement in the control group and 72 patients who underwent 72 times of midline catheter placement in the observation group. There was no significant difference between the patients in the two groups in terms of age, sex, diagnosis, or the use of anticoagulant medication ( Conclusion: Patients have low incidence of catheter-related complications when they have midline catheter placed under ultrasound guidance, which helps reduce the pain of repeated venous insertion that patients incur and the workload of clinical nurses. The use of midline catheters is appropriate for and should be popularized among patients with oral and maxillofacial malignant tumors, especially patients who have poor peripheral venous conditions and those who are undergoing repair and reconstruction surgeries.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousCatheterization, PeripheralNeoplasmsCathetersHumansRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyIntravenous therapyMidline catheterMouth neoplasmsRetrospective studyUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID37545073
PMCPMC10442615
OpenAlexW4385620464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.