Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37545024›Full record

ArticleEuropean eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association2024

Validation of the youth-nine item avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder screen.

Marley G Billman Miller, Hana F Zickgraf, Helen Burton Murray, Jamal H Essayli, Susan E Lane-Loney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Endorsement of Avoidant/Restrictive Eating Motivations Across Restrictive Eating Disorders: A Trait- and State-Level Examination.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marley G Billman MillerDepartment of Pediatrics, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Hana F ZickgrafEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Helen Burton MurrayCenter for Neurointestinal Health, Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2059-3256
Jamal H EssayliDepartment of Pediatrics, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Susan E Lane-LoneyDepartment of Pediatrics, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

A Biobehavioral Approach to Understand Problematic Avoidant/Restrictive Eating in Adults with Functional DyspepsiaK23DK131334 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BURTON MURRAY, HELEN · 2021 to 2025
$1.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK131334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study assessed the factorial, divergent, and criterion-related validity of the Youth-Nine Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) Screen (Y-NIAS) in a paediatric clinical sample at initial evaluation for an eating disorder (ED).

methodParticipants included 310 patients (82.9% female, 77.4% White, Age M = 14.65) from a tertiary ED clinic. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) evaluated the three-factor of the Y-NIAS. One-way analysis of variance compared Y-NIAS scores across diagnoses. A receiver operating curve analysis assessed the ability of each subscale to identify ARFID presentations from the full sample. Two logistic regressions assessed the criterion-related validity of the obtained Y-NIAS cut-scores.

resultsCFA supported the original three-factor structure of the Y-NIAS. Clinically-elevated scores were observed in all diagnostic groups except for binge-eating disorder. Subscales were unable to discriminate ARFID cases from other ED diagnoses. Cut scores were identified for picky eating subscale (10) and Fear subscale (9), but not for Appetite subscale. In combination with the ED Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q), classification accuracy was moderate for ARFID (62.7%) and other EDs (89.4%). DISCUSSION: The Y-NIAS demonstrated excellent factorial validity and internal consistency. Findings were mixed regarding the utility of the Y-NIAS for identifying clinically-significant ARFID presentations from other ED diagnoses.

Indexed as

Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake DisorderBinge-Eating DisorderFeeding and Eating DisordersAdolescentChildEatingFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective Studiesavoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID)children and adolescents

Identifiers

PMID37545024
PMCPMC10840920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.