ReviewSignal transduction and targeted therapy2023
Nanomedicine in cancer therapy.
Review in Signal transduction and targeted therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 376 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
376 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The mechanism of breast cancer stem cells and tumor microenvironment promoting radioresistance in breast cancer and its intervention strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Synergistic innovations of nanomedicine in lymphoma treatment: a systematic review.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Collagenase-mediated extracellular matrix targeting for enhanced drug penetration and therapeutic efficacy in nanoscale delivery systems for cancer therapy.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Pooled it
- Liposomal doxorubicin plus nab-paclitaxel with/without chemoradiotherapy in head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma: single-arm phase II study.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Trial
- Engineered probiotics couple photothermal cuproptosis with biomechanical disruption and immune activation.Bioactive materials · 2027Article
- Functionalized biomaterial platforms for interventional embolization therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma.Bioactive materials · 2027Review
- An endoplasmic reticulum-enriched nanogel couples ferroptotic tumor damage with macrophage reprogramming for triple-negative breast cancer immunotherapy.Bioactive materials · 2027Article
- Nanomedicine-based cancer immunotherapy: translational barriers, mechanistic strategies, and future perspectives.Drug delivery · 2026Review
- Lysosome-directed targeted protein degradation technologies for overcoming cancer drug resistance: mechanisms, design principles, and therapeutic opportunities.Drug delivery · 2026Review
- Nanotechnology-mediated podocyte injury repair: mechanistic exploration and therapeutic prospects.Renal failure · 2026Review
- Single-cell and longitudinal transcriptomics-guided engineering of FZD1-targeting precision nanotherapy against osteosarcoma cancer stem cells.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- A cell-free lipid sterosomal therapeutic enables bone regeneration via USP18-mediated noncanonical S1P signaling.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- 4D nanoimaging-guided smart therapeutics: spatiotemporal control of disease microenvironments.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Fast and robust T1 mapping based on a 3D dual-echo UTE sequence (PETALUTE) for superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle (SPION) biodistribution assessment.Medical physics · 2026Article
- PDL1-driven self-amplifying drug homing with immune homeostasis restoration.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Biohybrid nanovesicle-mediated targeted delivery of HSP90 inhibitor for enhanced sorafenib therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Nanoparticle delivery of Chinese medicine monomers for remodeling the colorectal cancer immune microenvironment.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Review
- Biomimetic Nanocarriers for Glioblastoma Therapy: Translational Advances and Strategic Challenges.Cancers · 2026Review
- Beta-cyclodextrin-based polymerized nanocarriers for doxorubicin delivery to cancer cells.Nanoscale advances · 2026Article
316 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer remains a highly lethal disease in the world. Currently, either conventional cancer therapies or modern immunotherapies are non-tumor-targeted therapeutic approaches that cannot accurately distinguish malignant cells from healthy ones, giving rise to multiple undesired side effects. Recent advances in nanotechnology, accompanied by our growing understanding of cancer biology and nano-bio interactions, have led to the development of a series of nanocarriers, which aim to improve the therapeutic efficacy while reducing off-target toxicity of the encapsulated anticancer agents through tumor tissue-, cell-, or organelle-specific targeting. However, the vast majority of nanocarriers do not possess hierarchical targeting capability, and their therapeutic indices are often compromised by either poor tumor accumulation, inefficient cellular internalization, or inaccurate subcellular localization. This Review outlines current and prospective strategies in the design of tumor tissue-, cell-, and organelle-targeted cancer nanomedicines, and highlights the latest progress in hierarchical targeting technologies that can dynamically integrate these three different stages of static tumor targeting to maximize therapeutic outcomes. Finally, we briefly discuss the current challenges and future opportunities for the clinical translation of cancer nanomedicines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.